Ceramic bearing fracture is a rare complication following implantation using modern day ceramic bearing materials. Revision bearing options in such cases is debated, with the choice between ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings. Revision to a hard on soft bearing raises concerns about potential catastrophic wear secondary to a third-body reaction caused by the fractured ceramic particles. Data was collected retrospectively from the NJR, electronic patient records, revision database and picture archiving and communication system. Templating software was used to determine linear wear between first post-operative radiograph and the latest available follow up. Univariate analysis was used to examine patient demographics and the wear rates for revision of ceramic bearing fractures to ceramic on polyethylene components. The intra and inter-rater reliability of wear measurements was calculated. There were twelve patients identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. The average age at revision was 62 years (54–72). There were 6 liner and 6 head fractures revised to delta ceramic heads and cross-linked polyethylene acetabular components. The most frequently used head size was 32mm. At mean follow up of 3.8 years (0.5 6.1 years), median 4.4 years, linear wear rate was calculated at 0.08± 0.06 mm/year. Both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was excellent with ICC scores of 0.99 at all timepoints. Revision to ceramic on polyethylene (CoP) bearings following ceramic fracture does not cause early catastrophic wear at early follow up. It appears safe to use this hard on soft bearing combination, given that wear rates are comparable to what is expected in a primary hip replacement setting. Longer follow up is required to establish if this trend persists

Improvements in ceramic materials, component design, and surgical technique have made ceramic bearing complications increasingly rare. However, when it happens, a fractured ceramic component can cause significant pain and morbidity following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The hard and sharp particulate debris from fractured ceramic components can cause damage to the existing hip prosthesis and jeopardise subsequent revision THA results due to third body wear. Patients with ceramic fractures can present with sudden onset of pain and dysfunction. Often, the patient will report a noisy hip articulation. Radiographs can range from subtle densities surrounding the hip implant to complete disintegration and loss of sphericity of the femoral head or acetabular liner. Ceramic component fractures should be treated expeditiously. Revision options for failed ceramic components depend on existing component fixation, position, and locking mechanism and femoral trunnion integrity. In order to retain the implants, the components must be well-fixed, in good position, and have tapers and locking mechanisms that can accept new modular components. Additionally, an extensile exposure and complete synovectomy are necessary to remove as much of the sharp particulate debris. Finally, a new ceramic ball head with a titanium inner sleeve should be used in revisions for fractured ceramics due to their hardness and scratch resistance. Early results for revision surgery for fractured ceramic components were inconsistent. Allain et al. reported on a series of 105 revisions performed for ceramic head fractures and found that the survivorship at 5 years was only 63%. The authors reported a high reoperation rate and also worse survivorship when the acetabular component was retained, a metal head was used for revisions, age younger than 50 years, and when a complete synovectomy was not performed at the time of revision. More recently, Sharma and colleagues reported on a series of 8 ceramic fractures revised to a metal-on-polyethylene articulation performed with a complete synovectomy. At 10-year follow-up, the authors reported on failures; increased wear; or lesser function compared to 6 matched patients undergoing revision using similar implants for other diagnoses. Others have also reported catastrophic failures when revising fractured ceramic components using metal ball heads. In summary, ceramic bearing complications in THA are rare but catastrophic events. A systematic approach to evaluation and management is necessary to ensure a safe return

We report a case of fatal heart failure caused by cobalt intoxication after revision THR in the patient who successfully underwent re-revision THR. 53-year old male presented to emergency room in our hospital with progressive shortness of breath. Symptom was started about 6 months ago so he visited local hospital. He worked up for worsening dyspnea. Simple chest radiograph and enhanced heart MRI study were performed and they showed bilateral pericardial and pleural effusion. There was no evidence of ischemic change. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed the evidence of heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction(EF) was 40%. He was admitted at local hospital and started on vasopressors but urine output was decreased and follow-up echocardiogram showed a 25% of EF. Patient recommended heart transplantation and transferred our hospital emergency room. He underwent sequential bilateral total hip arthroplasties using CoP bearing surfaces. At 12 years postoperatively, he presented to the other hospital with acute onset of left hip pain. He was diagnosed ceramic head fracture on his left hip. Head and liner change revision surgery was performed using Cobalt-Chrome alloy 28mm metal head and Protruded cross-linked polyethylene liners. In our hospital, the patient admitted cardiovascular department of internal medicine. Patient complained nonspecific fatigue and general weakness but had no other symptoms such as visual and hearing loss, cognitive dysfuction. During work-up, patient presented progressive left hip pain and complaint of discomfort for the mass on the left groin. He also complained Left leg weakness and numbness. Simple radiograph and enhanced CT study was done. Simple radiograph image shows radiodense area around the hip joint and radiologist suspected heterotopic ossification. The cardiovascular department consulted orthopedic department. In the image findings showed huge mass combined hemorrhagic component lining acetabular component extending psoas compartment and eccentric wear on cobalt-chrome alloy metal head. Also highly radiodense material was seen around neck inferor portion and severly deformed metal head was seen. It was highly suspected that metal related granuloma, which means severe metallosis. Performed heavy metals screen, cobalt levels were 397,800 μg/Land chrome levels were 236,000 μg/L suggesting cobalt toxicity. Hip joint aspiration was done for decompression as radiologic intervention and EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetate) chelation therapy started immediately. After 10 cycle chelating therapy, metal level was lowered cobalt levels by 255.2μg/L and chrome levels by 39.5 μg/L. When hospital day after 134, Medical condition of the patient was getting improved, we underwent revision surgery using ceramic on ceramic bearing surface. The patient discharged postoperative 79 days. Final heavy metals screen results were 27.79μg/L on cobalt and 22.17μg/L on chrome. Although there were also reported a good clinical result of revision surgery using MoP bearing, and some surgeons reluctant to use CoC articulation because of concerns about re-fracture of ceramic. But take into account like this devastating complication after cobalt-chrome wear caused by remained ceramic particles, we should carefully select which bearing is safer

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have low wear, but the unique risk of fracture. After revision for CoC fracture, ceramic third bodies can lead to runaway wear of cobalt chrome (CoCr) causing extremely elevated blood cobalt. We present five cases of ceramic liner fractures revised to a CoCr head associated with the rapid development of severe cobalt toxicity. We identified 5 cases of fractured CoC THA treated with revision to CoCr on highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) – three to conventional bearings and two to modular dual mobility bearings (CoCr acetabular liner, CoCr femoral head, and HXLPE). Mean follow up was 2.5 years after CoCr/HXLPE re-revision. Symptoms of cobalt toxicity occurred at average 9.5 months after revision for ceramic fracture (range 6–12). All patients developed vision and hearing loss, balance difficulties, and peripheral neuropathy. Several had cardiomyopathy, endocrinopathy, and local skin discoloration. Two reported hip pain. Re-revision for cobalt toxicity occurred at an average of 22 months (range 10–36) after revision for ceramic fracture. Average serum cobalt level at re-revision was 991 μg/L (range 734–1302, normal <1 μg/L). All CoCr heads exhibited massive wear with asphericity; deep tissues exhibited prominent metallosis. Treatment consisted of debridement and revision to a ceramic head with HXLPE. Serum cobalt improved to an average of 25 μg/L at final follow up. All patients reported partial improvement in vision and hearing; peripheral neuropathy and balance did not recover. Systemic cobalt toxicity is a rare but devastating complication of ceramic fracture in THA treated with cobalt-alloy bearings. Cobalt alloy bearings should be avoided in this setting. The diagnosis of systemic cobalt toxicity requires a high index of suspicion and was typically delayed following systemic symptoms. Debridement and revision to a ceramic-on-HXLPE leads to improvement but not resolution of cobalt toxicity complications

Ceramic bearing fractures are rare events, but mandate revision and implantation of new bearings. Revisions using metal heads have been reported to lead to gross volumetric head wear (due to abrasive retained ceramic micro-debris), cobalt toxicity, multi-organ failure and death. Such complications are widely published (50+ reports), yet we know that patients continue to be put at risk. Using data from the NJR and AOANJRR, this study seeks to compare the risk of re-revision and death by revision bearing combination following a ceramic bearing fracture. Data were extracted from the NJR and AOANJRR, identifying revisions for ceramic bearing fracture. Subsequent outcomes of survival, re-revision and death were compared between revision bearing combinations (ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-polyethylene, and metal-on-polyethylene). 366 cases were available for analysis from the NJR dataset (MoP=34, CoP=112, CoC=221) and 174 from the AOANJRR dataset (MoP=17, CoP=44, CoC=113). The overall incidence rate of adverse outcome (revision or death) was 0.65 for metal heads and 0.23 for ceramic head articulations (p=0.0012) across the whole time period (NJR). Kaplan-Meir survival estimates demonstrate an increased risk of both re-revision and death where a metal head has been used vs a ceramic head following revision for ceramic fracture. There are few decisions in arthroplasty surgery that can lead to serious harm or death for our patients, but revision using a metal head following ceramic bearing fracture is one of them. This study enhances the signal of what is already known but previously only reported as inherently low-level evidence (case reports and small series) due to event rarity. Use of a metal head in revision for ceramic fracture represents an avoidable patient safety issue, which revision guidelines should seek to address

Introduction and Objective. Ceramic on Ceramic bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) afford a low friction coefficient, low wear rates and extreme hardness. Significant complications include hip squeak, ceramic fracture and poor polyethylene performance in revision procedures due to imbedding of abrasive microscopic ceramic fragments. We report on the results of this bearing at a minimum of 10 years. Materials and Methods. A single-centre retrospective review of 449 THAs was performed. Primary outcome measures included aseptic revision and all-cause revision rates at a minimum of 10 years post operatively. Evaluation of functionality was performed with WOMAC and SF-36 scores which were performed pre-operatively and at intervals of 6 months, one year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post operatively. Results. There was a 6.2% (n=28) all-cause and 5.3% (n=24) aseptic revision rate for ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty at minimum of 10 years with a mean time to revision 4.8 years (range 2 months − 11.6 years). Notably, there were 2 revisions for ceramic head fracture, one for ceramic liner fracture, 3 for aseptic loosening and 3 revisions for squeaking. Pain of unknown origin was the most common reason for revision. There was an improvement in postoperative WOMAC scores from a mean of 59.8 (range 15–95) pre-operatively to a mean of 15.6 (range 0–78) at 10 years. Conclusions. This study showed good functional outcomes but high revision rates for CoC THA at a minimum of 10 years. The role for CoC bearings in THA has been called into question in recent years and may continue to decline in popularity, even in younger patients. Further large scale studies are important to assess the long-term outcomes of this bearing surface

Background. Theoretically, improved material properties of new alumina matrix composite (AMC) material, Delta ceramics, are expected to decrease concerns associated with pure alumina ceramics and allow manufacturing thinner liners and consequent larger heads. However, limited short-term clinical results are available and mid-term results of these effects are unclear. Questions/Purposes. (1) Does AMC material decrease the rate of ceramic fracture and noise, concerns of previous-generation ceramics, following change of material properties? (2) Does the possible use of larger heads consequent to manufacturing thinner liners decrease dislocation rate and affect inguinal pain? (3) Do any other complications associated with the use of AMC ceramics occur?. Materials and Methods. One-hundred cementless primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using AMC ceramic bearings were performed consecutively by single surgeon. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 years (range, 5.0 to 5.7) and average age at the time of arthroplasty was 54.7 years. Prostheses with identical design and Biolox® Delta ceramics were used in all patients. Clinical evaluation included the occurrence of inguinal pain and noise which was classified into squeaking, clicking, grinding and popping. Ceramic fracture, dislocation and any other complications associated with the use of AMC ceramics were also investigated. Result. No ceramic fracture occurred and noise was reported in three patients (3.2%); three subjective clicking, but no squeaking. Single event of perioperative dislocation due to incompliance occurred in one hip (1.1%) and inguinal pain was reported in two hips (2.1 %); neither evidence of iliopsoas tendinitis on ultrasonography, nor association with ceramic head size (p>0.05). Liner dissociation following initial square seating was shown immediately after surgery in one hip (1.1%) and underwent revision THA. Conclusion. Improved material properties combined with the possible use of larger-diameter head make AMC ceramics a promising alternative bearing option with reduced risk of ceramic fracture, squeaking and dislocation. In spite of these encouraging results, however, meticulous technical precautions such as square seating and proper impaction in particular, should be taken during whole process of liner insertion

Fracture risks are the most common argument against the use of Ceramic on ceramic (CoC) hip implants. Question: is ceramic material at risk in case of severe local trauma?. Over a long period, we tried to identify patients with a CoC prosthesis (Ceraver Osteal°)who did sustain a trauma. This was conducted in three different institutions. Eleven patients were found: 9 males and 2 females aged 17 to 70 years at time of index surgery. Accident occurred 6 months to 15 years after index: one car accident, five motorcycle accident, five significant trauma after a fall, including one ski board accident. Consequences of these trauma were: six fractures of the acetabulum with socket loosening in 4 that needed revision, two femoral shaft fracture, one orifed and one stem exchanged, one traumatic hip dislocation associated to loosening of the socket revised at 10 years, and one traumatic loosening of the socket. Ten had no consequence on ceramic integrity. One experienced a fracture of the patella from a dashboard trauma, a liner shipping was discovered during socket revision 2 years later. This is the only case of possible relation between trauma and ceramic fracture. In a more recent longitudinal study on 1856 CoC prosthesis performed from 2010 to 2021, 29 severe traumas were identified with no consequence on Ceramic material. From this limited case study, it can be assumed that Pure Alumina Ceramic well designed and manufactured, will not break after a significant trauma

Introduction. Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene due to their low wear and minimal particle production. However, ceramic-on-ceramic implants have been associated with ceramic fracture and squeaking. To address these issues, large ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced although limited data are available on their clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report the midterm results of primary total hip arthroplasty using a 32mm with a titanium-alloy sleeve. Materials & Methods. We reviewed 245 patients who had 274 total hip arthroplasties with a 32 mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve and had been followed for more than 5 years (average, 6.5 years; range, 5–9 years). The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55.1 years (range, 16–82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina (Fig. 1). We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips, and presence of osteolysis. Results. The survival rate of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in primary total hip arthroplasty using 32 mm ceramic head with titanium-alloy sleeve was 97.5% at 9 years (Fig. 2). The Harris hip score improved from mean of 47 preoperatively to 93 at last follow-up. One ceramic head fractured at 6 years postoperatively. No ceramic liners were seen to fracture. Audible hip noise was identified in five hips (1.8%); clicking in four and squeaking in one. Osteolysis was detected in four hips (1.5%), but all had no symptom (Fig. 3). Other complications included three deep infections, two dislocations, and one peroneal nerve palsy. Conclusions. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32 mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve has a high survival rate of 97.5% at a 9-year follow-up. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of the potential risks of ceramic fracture, noise, and osteolysis associated with the use of ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve

Ceramic bearing complications are rare but can cause significant pain and morbidity following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The hard and sharp particulate debris from fractured ceramic components can cause damage to the existing hip prosthesis and jeopardise subsequent revision THA results due to third body wear. Patients with ceramic fractures can present with sudden onset of pain and dysfunction. Often, the patient will report a noisy hip articulation. Radiographs can range from subtle densities surrounding the hip implant to complete disintegration and loss of sphericity of the femoral head or acetabular liner. Ceramic component fractures should be treated expeditiously. Revision options for failed ceramic components depend on existing component fixation, position, and locking mechanism and femoral trunnion integrity. In order to retain the implants, the components must be well-fixed, in good position, and have tapers and locking mechanisms that can accept new modular components. Additionally, an extensile exposure and complete synovectomy are necessary to remove the sharp particulate debris. Finally, a new ceramic ball head with a titanium inner sleeve should be used in revisions for fractured ceramics due to their hardness and scratch resistance. Early results for revision surgery for fractured ceramic components were inconsistent. Allain et al. reported on a series of 105 revisions performed for ceramic head fractures and found that the survivorship at 5 years was only 63%. The authors reported a high reoperation rate and also worse survivorship when the acetabular component was retained, a metal head was used for revisions, age younger than 50 years, and when a complete synovectomy was not performed at the time of revision. More recently, Sharma and colleagues reported on a series of 8 ceramic fractures revised to a metal-on-polyethylene articulation performed with a complete synovectomy. At 10-year follow up, the authors reported on failures; increased wear; or lesser function compared to 6 matched patients undergoing revision using similar implants for other diagnoses. Others have also reported catastrophic failures when revising fractured ceramic components using metal ball heads. In summary, ceramic bearing complications in THA are rare but catastrophic events. A systematic approach to evaluation and management is necessary to ensure a safe return

The disadvantage of removing a well-fixed femoral stem are multiple (operating time, risk of fracture, bone and blood loss, recovery time and post-op complications. Ceramic heads with titanium adapter sleeves (e.g. BIOLOX®OPTION, Ceramtec) are a possibility for putting a new ceramic head on slightly damaged used tapers. ‘Intolerable’ taper damages even for this solution are qualitatively specified by the manufacturers. The aim of this study was to determine the fracture strength of ceramic heads with adapter sleeves on stem tapers with such defined damage patterns. Pristine stem tapers (Ti-6Al-4V, 12/14) were damaged to represent the four major stem taper damage patterns specified by the manufacturers: . -. ‘Truncated’: Removal of 12.5% of the circumference along the entire length of the stem taper at a uniform depth of 0.5mm parallel to the taper slope. -. ‘Slanted’: Removal of 33.3% of the proximal diameter perimeter with decreasing damage down to 3.7mm from the proximal taper end. -. ‘Cut’: Removal of the proximal 25% (4mm) of the stem taper. -. ‘Scratched’: Stem tapers from a previous ceramic fracture test study with a variety of scratches and crushing around the upper taper edge from multiple ceramic head fractures. -. The ‘Control’ group consisted of three pristine tapers left undamaged. BIOLOX®OPTION heads (Ø 32mm, length M) with Ti adapter sleeves were assembled to the damaged stem tapers and subjected to ISO7206-10 ultimate compression strength testing. The forces required to fracture the head were high and caused complete destruction of the ceramic heads in all cases. The ‘Truncated’ group showed the lowest values (136kN ± 4.37kN; Fig. 3). Forces were higher and similar for the ‘Cut’ (170kN ± 8.89kN), ‘Control’ (171.8 ± 16.5kN) and ‘Slanted’ (173kN ± 21.9kN) groups, the ‘Scratched’ group showed slightly higher values (193kN ± 11.9kN). The Ti adapter sleeves were plastically deformed but did not fail catastrophically. The present study suggests that manufacturer's recommendations for removal of a well fixed femoral stem could be narrowed down to the ‘Truncated’ condition. Even this might not be necessary since the fracture load is still substantially higher than the ASTM standard requires. Surgeons should consider to keep stems with larger taper damages as previously thought and spare the patient from stem revision. The greatest reservation regarding adapter sleeves is the introduction of the new metal-on-metal interface between stem and sleeve, which could possibly facilitate fretting-corrosion, which is presently one of the major concerns for modular junctions (3). Clinically such problems have not been reported yet. Ongoing FE-simulations are performed to investigate whether micromotions between stem and head taper are altered by the investigated damages

Introduction. Long term results of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are affected by wear of articulation. Ceramic on ceramic articulation have been used especially for young patients because of its low wear and bio-inert property. However, because of its hardness, it is concerned that ceramic fracture, chipping, or squeaking might happen with ceramic on ceramic articulation. Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate over 10-years clinical and radiographic results of ceramic bearing cementless THA. Methods. Evaluation was performed in 60 patients (68 joints) who underwent primary cementless THA from May 2003 to April 2007. Mean age at surgery was 59 years. Mean follow up period was 11.2 years. Forty-nine patients were female. Mean BMI at surgery was 24.0 kg/m. 2. Fifty-one patients had osteoarthrosis, 6 patients had osteonecrosis, 2 patients had rheumatoid arthraitis, and 1 patient had PSS. A 28mm-size femoral head was used in all patients. Clinical evaluation was performed with Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Score (JOA score). Radiographic results were evaluated with standard bilateral hip radiograph in supine position. Results. Mean clinical score at surgery was 45 (pain: 13/40, ROM: 12/20, gait: 9/20, ADL: 12/20). Mean clinical score at final follow up was 92 (pain: 39/40, ROM: 17/20, gait: 17/20, ADL: 18/20). Pain score was dramatically improved from 13 to 39 (maximum pain score: 40). One stem was revised because of recurrent dislocation. Two other patients experienced one time dislocation during follow up. One stem showed 5mm of subsidence. ALL cups and stems showed bone ingrowth at final follow up. Cortical hypertrophy was seen in 17 joints. However, there was no patient complained thigh pain. Stress shielding was seen in 55 joints (81%). First, second and third degree of stress shielding were seen in 12, 40, and 3 joints, respectively. Most of the female patients who had surgery at the age over 60 years showed second and third degree of stress shielding. There was no measurable wear. No osteolysis was found around the implants. There were no ceramic fracture, chipping, and squeaking. Conclusion. This study demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic results of ceramic bearing cementless THA. Excellent long term results will be expected with this system

Purpose. The fourth generation ceramic, in which zirconia is incorporated into the alumina matrix, was developed to reduce the risk of ceramic fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, clinical and radiographic results, and bearing-related failures associated with total hip arthroplasty using zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings over a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Materials and methods. We retrospectively analysed 135 patients (151 hips) who underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty using zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. There were 58 men and 77 women with mean age of 55.9 years (range, 20 to 82 years) at index surgery. Acetabular and femoral components were cementless in all hips. A 36 mm head was used in 81 of 151 hips and a 32 mm head was used in 70 hips with smaller acetabular shells. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.1 years (range, 5 to 6.8 years). Results. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with an end point of revision for any reason was 100% at 6.8 years. All acetabular and femoral components showed bony ingrowth. No radiographic evidence of osteolysis was identified. No ceramic fracture occurred. There were 4 (2.6%) noisy hips (1 squeaking and 3 clickings), but no patient could reproduce the noise and required revision. Other complications included one iliopsoas tendonitis and one dislocation. Conclusions. The minimum 5-year results of total hip arthroplasties performed using 32 mm or 36 mm zirconia-toughened alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were encouraging with excellent survivorship. However, it was also found that the risk of noise development remains even for the newest generation of ceramics

Introduction. The optimal bearing for hip arthroplasty is still a matter of debate. in younger and more active patients ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearings are frequently chosen over metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings to reduce wear and increase biocompatibility. However, the fracture risk of ceramic heads is higher than that of metal heads. This can cause serious issue, as ceramic fractures pose a serious complication often necessitating major revision surgery – a complication more frequently seen in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. To date, there are no long-term data (> 20 years of follow-up) reporting fracture rates of the ceramic femoral heads in CoP bearings. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of 348 cementless THAs treated with 2nd generation Biolox® Al2O3 Ceramic-on-Polyethylene (CoP) bearings, which had been consecutively implanted between January 1985 and December 1989. At implantation the mean patient age was 57 years. The cohort was subsequently followed for a minimum of 20 years. At the final follow-up 111 patients had died, and 5 were lost to follow-up (Fig. 1). A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of ceramic head fractures over the long-term. Results. (Figs. 2, 3):. After 22-years the cumulative incidence of ceramic head fracture was estimated at 0.3% (95%-CI, 0–2.4%; 38 hips at risk). No impending failures could be noted on radiographic analysis at final follow-up. Discussion. The fracture rate of second-generation ceramic heads using a CoP articulation remains very low into the third decade after cementless THA; ceramic heads appear to be a safe alternative to metal femoral heads. Summary. This study evaluates the long-term (20–25 year) survivorship of cement on polyethylene bearings in uncemented THA

Introduction: The tribiological properties of bearing surfaces are one of the main topics in discussion in the orthopaedic research. Hard-on-hard bearings are one of the ways to reduce wear rates. Modern hard-on-hard bearing low wear rates depend on the correct pairing of bearing surfaces and strict manufacturing tolerances in surface roughness, clearance, and roundness. There have been some concerns in using ceramic bearings, particularly regarding the fracture rate and their subsequent management. Hence, we present here 2 similar cases that highlight the catastrophic failure of metal head when used subsequently to treat the complication of ceramic fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Case Details: Two patients underwent primary THA at different centres with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. After an initial asymptomatic period of 2 years, ceramic fracture occurred in both the cases, which were subsequently replaced by metal-on-polyethylene bearings by the primary surgeons. One year after the revision of bearings, both the patients developed severe pain and discomfort, which on further investigation revealed massive metallosis, wear of the metal head and aseptic loosening of the acetabular components with cavitation in acetabulum. Both the patients underwent revision THA under the senior author at our tertiary centre-Wrightington Hospital. Intraoperatively near total erosion of the metal head was noted with more than one litre of black, dense material collection in and around the hip joint revealing extensive metallosis. The acetabular cup was grossly loose and significant loss of bone stock was noted due to metallosis. Single stage revision surgery was performed with impaction bone grafting for deficient acetabulum and cemented components were used. At one-year follow-up none of the cases have shown any further wear or complications. Conclusion: One of the main objectives of successful THA is to improve implant longevity. To achieve this understanding the mechanisms of wear between the interacting surfaces is extremely important. The use of ceramic head is good, but there is always a risk of fracture. We do not recommend using metal heads in cases with prior ceramic fractures, as the wear of metal is most likely to occur as it is an ongoing process due to the residual ceramic debris. Hence in these difficult scenarios we recommend usage of ceramic-on-polyethylene as a safe option to prevent catastrophic erosion of metal head and improve implant longevity

The fourth generation Delta ceramic, in which zirconia is incorporated into the alumina matrix, was developed to provide improved fracture toughness and wear characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the minimum 5-year outcomes and bearing-specific complications in a single surgeon series of Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We retrospectively analysed 667 patients (749 hips) who underwent cementless THAs using Delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearings by a single surgeon. There were 315 men and 352 women with mean age of 55 years (range, 16 to 88 years) at the time of index surgery. Acetabular and femoral components were cementless in all hips. A 36 mm head was used in 472 hips and a 32 mm head was used in 227 hips. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.3 years (range, 5 to 8 years). The mean Harris hip score improved from 47.6 points preoperatively to 91.1 points at the time of final follow-up. All but one acetabular components were well-fixed, and all but one femoral components were well-fixed. No radiographic evidence of osteolysis was identified at the time of final follow-up. There were 2 (0.27%) ceramic liner fractures and no ceramic head fracture. A total of 48 hips (6.4%) exhibited an audible noise (29 clickings and 19 squeakings), but no patient required revision. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with an end point of revision for any reason was 98.7% at 6.3 years. Delta ceramic-on-ceramic THAs provide excellent clinical outcomes without osteolysis at the minimum 5-year follow-up. However, we also found 0.27% ceramic liner fractures and 6.4% audible noises associated with the use of Delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearings

Introduction. Wear performances and fracture toughness of the alumina-matrix composite (AMC) Biolox-delta(r) are pointed out in the literature. This study is a prospective monocentric evaluation of 32 and 36 mm AMC/AMC bearing surfaces. Material and methods. 141 THA were included prospectively since 2006 in 127 patients. (62 females, 65 males, mean age 62, 2 years, mean BMI 25, 5). 134 cases were primary implantations. Mean follow-up is 40.9 months (29.8-53.4). In all patients we used the same cementless stem and cup. Clinical and radiological data were evaluated with a special attention for ceramic fracture and squeaking. Results. At follow-up mean HHS is 95.4. We faced current problems in this series (2 post-op.dislocations in non compliant patients, 1 hematoma, 3 early septic complications in immunodepressed patients). Intraoperative events were 3 non relevant femur fractures and 1 partial acetabular fracture. 4 cases needed a revision (1 cup and 1 stem loosening, 1 painful stem, 1 limb length discrepancy). No abnormal wear, osteolysis or implants migration could be detected in the other cases. No ceramic head fracture or liner chipping occurred. No patient reported squeaking. Discussion and conclusion. In this monocentric report the Delta COC articulation provides similar functional scores and survivorship as previously published ceramic on ceramic series. We did not observe ceramic fracture. Unusual rates of liner chipping have been described in an other multicentric study. According to our experience and despite the short follow-up, we suggest that those complications could be related to cup design rather than to the ceramic material

Osteolysis is one of a major cause of failure that affect long term survival rate in THA. Hard-on-hard bearing surface were developed to reduce wear and osteolysis, such as ceramic-on-ceramic which is the lowest wear rate was introduced but it still has squeaking and ceramic fracture. Metal-on-metal bearing surface significantly reduce wear rate but it still release metal ion which affect local tissue reaction. Then ceramic-on-metal is another choice of bearing with combine the advantage of reduce wear rate, metal ion release, no stripe wear, no squeaking and no ceramic fracture. However after clinical use ALTRs may occur and disturb the longevity of THA. During January 2009 to December 2009 we performed 98 THR with the same femoral stem and acetabular cup with difference bearing which were 87 cases of metal on cross-linked PE, 8 cases of ceramic on metal and 5 cases of metal on metal. Routinely postoperative care were done with clinical evaluation, plain x-rays and Harris hip score. After 5 years follow up there are clinical problems in ceramic on metal THA with decrease clinical score and progressive osteolysis in radiographic finding in 2 cases then we investigated to find the cause of this problem and revise the components. We preformed magnetic resonance imaging and collect blood sample for ESR, CRP and Cobalt and Chromium level. We revised 2 cases of ceramic on metal THA, during surgery we collected tissue for bacterial and AFB and histopathology. All retrieval components were studied for wear pattern. First patient have thigh pain and progressive osteolysis after year 4. th. of follow up. She had normal ESR and CRP with high level of cobalt and chromium level. We revised both components and tissue histopathology showed metallosis with chronic inflammation. Another patient had failure due to ALTRs with mixed solid-cystic mass at trochanteric bursa but component is stable then only bearing surface were change. Wear pattern at femoral head was in weight bearing area with corresponding to apical center wear of metal liner. Our study showed that only in group of ceramic-on-metal THA that have 5 years follow up have early reoperation due to osteolysis and tissue reaction. We routinely stop to use this bearing since 2010. But we have small number of cases in our study to conclude that is bearing are not suitable for clinical usage

Ceramic bearing complications are rare, but can be a catastrophic complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Particulate debris from fractured ceramics can cause damage to the hip prosthesis and jeopardise subsequent revision THA. Patients with ceramic fractures can present with sudden onset of pain and dysfunction. Often, the patient will report a noisy hip articulation. Radiographs can range from subtle densities surrounding the hip implant to complete disintegration and loss of sphericity of the femoral head or acetabular liner. Ceramic component fractures should be treated expeditiously. Revision options for failed ceramic components depend on existing component fixation, position, and type. In order to retain the implants, the components must be well fixed, appropriately positioned, and have tapers that are undamaged and can accept current femoral heads. Additionally, an extensile exposure and complete synovectomy are necessary to remove the sharp ceramic particulate debris. Finally, a ceramic ball head should be used to revise a fractured ceramic THA. Newer, alumina composite ceramic ball heads are harder, reliable, and more scratch resistant compared to metal ball heads. However, when retaining the femoral component, a ceramic ball head with a titanium sleeve should be used to prevent subsequent failures. In summary, ceramic bearing complications are rare but catastrophic events. A systematic approach to evaluation and management is necessary to ensure a safe return

Ceramic bearing complications are a rare, but can be catastrophic, complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Particulate debris from these failed bearings can cause damage the underlying femoral and acetabular components and/or cause further damage to future hip implants. Failure to recognise and appropriately manage these events can lead to significant morbidity. Ceramic component fractures should be treated expeditiously. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can result in destructive damage of the underlying hip prosthesis caused by sharp, abrasive wear of ceramic particles. Patients with ceramic fractures present with sudden onset of pain and dysfunction. Often, the patient will report a noisy hip articulation. Radiographs can range from subtle densities surrounding the hip implant to complete disintegration and loss of sphericity of the femoral head or acetabular liner. As with any other causes of failed joint arthroplasty, a systematic evaluation and workup for failure is mandatory prior to revision surgery. Revision options for failed ceramic components depend on component fixation, position, and type. In order to retain existing implants, the components must be well fixed, appropriately positioned, and have tapers that are undamaged and can accept current femoral heads. If these conditions are not met, then revision of components should be performed to optimise outcomes. Additionally, an extensile exposure is necessary in order to perform a complete synovectomy in order to remove as much of the ceramic particulate debris. Finally, the question of optimal bearing choice following component revision remains an area of debate. Newer, alumina composite ceramic ball heads are harder and more scratch resistant that metal ball heads and therefore preferred in my personal practice. In summary, ceramic bearing complications are rare but catastrophic events. A systematic approach to evaluation and management is necessary to ensure a safe return