The most important determinant in the treatment of malleolar fractures is stability. Stable fractures have an intact deep deltoid ligament and do not displace with functional treatment. If the deep deltoid/medial malleolar complex is disrupted, the talus is at risk of displacement. Weber (2010) showed that weightbearing radiographs predicted stability in patients with undisplaced ankle fractures. We developed clinical criteria for potential instability and applied them to a prospective series of patients. Criteria included: medial clear space of < 4mm; medial tenderness, bruising or swelling; a fibular fracture above the syndesmosis; a bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture; an open fracture; a high-energy fracture mechanism. A consecutive, prospectively documented series of 37 patients chose functional brace treatment of potentially unstable fractures. Weightbearing radiographs were performed in the brace before treatment, and free of brace at clinical union (6–9 weeks in all patients). Patients were encouraged to bear full weight and actively exercise their ankles in the brace. All fractures healed without displacement. The risk of displacement was 0% (95% CI 0–11.2%). This preliminary series gives support for the use of weightbearing radiographs to guide treatment of undisplaced ankle fractures

Radial head fractures are common and mainly require a functional conservative treatment. About 20% of patients will present an unsatisfactory final functional result. There is, however, little data allowing us to predict which patients are at risk of bad evolve. This makes it difficult to optimize our therapeutic strategies in these patients. The aim of this study is to determine the personal and environmental factors that influence the functional prognosis of patients with a radial head fracture. We realized over a 1-year period a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study including 125 consecutive patients referred for a fracture of the radial head in a tertiary trauma center. We originally collected the factors believed to be prognostic indicators: age, sex, socioeconomic status, factors related to trauma or fracture, alcohol, tobacco, detection of depression scale, and financial compensation. A clinical and radiological follow-up took place at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The main functional measurement tool is the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). 123 patients were included in the study. 114 patients required nonsurgical management. 102 patients completed the 1-year follow-up for the main outcome (89 for the DASH score). Two patients required an unplanned surgery and were excluded from analyses. At 1 year, the average MEPS was 96.5 (range, 65–100) and 81% of subjects had an excellent result (MEPS ≥90). The most constant factor to predict an unsatisfactory functional outcome (MEPS <90 or DASH >17) is the presence of depressive symptoms at the initial time of the study (P = 0.03 and P = 0.0009, respectively). This factor is present throughout the follow-up. Other observed factors include a higher socioeconomic status (P = 0.009), the presence of financial compensation (P = 0.027), and a high-velocity trauma (P = 0.04). The severity of the fracture, advanced age, female sex, and the nature of the treatment does not influence the result at 1 year. No factor has been associated with a reduction in range of motion. Most of the radial head fractures heal successfully. We identified for the first time, with a valid tool, the presence of depressive symptoms at the time of the fracture as a significant factor for an unsatisfactory functional result. Early detection is simple and fast and would allow patients at risk to adopt complementary strategies to optimize the result

Purpose. Surgical repair is the preferred method of treatment of acute Achilles ruptures in North America because, despite a higher risk of overall complications, it offers a reduced risk of re-rupture. However, more recent trials, particularly those using functional bracing with early range of motion (ROM) have challenged this statement. This meta-analysis aims to compare surgical to conservative treatment in respect to re-rupture, overall complications, return to work, calf circumference and functional outcomes, as well as to examine the effects of early ROM on re-rupture rate. Method. Literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Publication bias was assessed using the Eggar and Begg tests. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 tests. Fixed or random-effects models were used accordingly. Pooled results were expressed as risk ratios, risk differences, and weighted or standardized mean difference, as appropriate. Meta-regression was employed to identify heterogeneity causes. Sub-group analysis was performed to assess the effect of early ROM. Results. Nine study fit inclusion criteria. If early ROM is employed, re-rupture rates were equal for surgical and non-surgical patients (RD 0.6% p=0.782). If functional treatment is not employed, the absolute risk reduction achieved by surgery was 8.8% (p=0.002). Surgery was associated with an absolute risk increase of 15.7% (p=0.026) for overall complications. Surgical patients returned to work 19.16 days sooner (p=0.0014). There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments in terms of calf circumference (p=0.357), strength (p=0.806), or functional outcomes (p=0.226). Conclusion. According our results, for centers using functional rehabilitation, conservative treatment should be preferred, as it results in similar re-rupture rates as surgical treatment, while offering the advantage of decreased overall complications. For centers that do not employ early ROM protocols, surgical repair can be considered as it decreases re-rupture risk