The aim was to examine the descriptive epidemiology of
Purpose. This report compares midterm results of open neck osteoplasty +
neck osteotomy vs arthroscopic osteoplasty for severe
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disorder in children 9–15 years old. The epidemiology for SCFE in the total population of Sweden has not yet been described. In a prospective cohort study, we analysed pre- and postoperative radiographs and medical records for all children treated for SCFE in Sweden 2007–2013, and noted demographic data, severity of slip, and surgical procedures performed.Purpose
Methods
Debate remains over the optimal treatment for severe unstable SCFE. AVN is the principle problem; current thinking suggests this can be minimized by emergent reduction and fixation within 24 hours. If emergent treatment is not possible, open osteotomy with a variable delay of 10–21 days has been advocated. We present our experience of delayed intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy (ICO) SCFE cases were identified through ICD-10 coding and theatre records. Unstable slips were identified and reviewed retrospectively. When ICO was performed, the hip was accessed via anterior approach without hip dislocation. A cuneiform shortening osteotomy of the neck with physeal excision was undertaken. The epiphysis was carefully reduced and stabilized with a single screw.Aim
Methods
We have reviewed the complication rate over a ten year period for removal of screws placed for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and have surveyed the views of orthopaedic surgeons with an adult hip practice in Scotland on leaving the metalwork in situ. Whilst screw removal is favoured by many orthopaedic surgeons, a recent review of the literature reported that the complication rate for removal of implants placed for SCFE was 34%. Between 1998 and 2007 84 patients had insertion of screws for SCFE. Of these 54 patients had screws removed, 51 of these records were available. The median duration between insertion and removal of screws was 2 yrs 7 months. Of the 51 children, overall five (9.8%) had complications - three (5.9%) major and two (3.9%) minor. Two screws could not be removed; one patient sustained a fracture after screw removal and two developed an infection. We assessed the attitudes of adult hip surgeons on this topic using an electronic questionnaire which was completed by 29 out of 40 recipients. 78.6% of respondents support routine removal and 21.4% favour leaving the screw permanently in place. 82.2% had needed to remove metalwork from a hip requiring arthroplasty in a patient whose metalwork was inserted during childhood; and described their experience of this including the complications encountered. We have identified a lower complication rate following screw removal inserted for SCFE than in published series. Most adult hip surgeons support routine removal once the physis is closed but studies regarding the long-term outcome of retained orthopaedic implants are needed since even with this lower complication rate the question of routine removal remains unclear.
Audit of the outcome of subcapital osteotomy for a series of cases of severe unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. 57 cases of unstable severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis were operated on by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2011. The procedure was performed through the anterior abductor sparing approach. Patients have been followed up prospectively and the results are presented at average follow up is 6.4 years with a minimum of 18 month follow to include all risks of avn.Aim:
Method:
To inform a working group of UK paediatric surgeons (the UK SCFE Study Group) convened to design pertinent trials in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), three centres (Bristol, Newcastle and Barts and The London) reviewed the demographics and management of children with SCFE presenting between 2007 and 2012. At all contributing centres with digital PACS records for a minimum of 5 years, a search for the following terms was made of PACS reports: slipped capital femoral epiphysis, slipped upper femoral epiphysis, SCFE and SUFE. From the results, radiographs and electronically stored clinic letters were assessed to confirm the diagnosis and ascertain age at presentation, incidence of bilaterality, chronicity, stability (Loder criteria), management and complications.Aim
Method
The aim was to assess contemporary management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by surveying members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). A questionnaire with 5 case vignettes was used. Two questions examined the timing of surgery for an acute unstable SCFE in a child presenting at 6 hours and at 48 hours after start of symptoms. Two further questions explored the preferred method of fixation in mild and severe stable SCFE. The final question examined the management of the contralateral normal hip. Responses were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and the data w analysed using a chi-squared test. The response rate was 56% (110/196). 88.2% (97/110) responded that if a child presented with an acute unstable SCFE within 6 hours, they would treat it within 24 hours of presentation, compared with 40.9% (45/110) for one presenting 48 hours after the onset of symptoms (P<0.0001). 52.6% (58/110) of surveyed BSCOS members would offer surgery for an unstable SCFE between 1 and 7 days after onset of symptoms. Single screw fixation in situ was advocated by 96.4% (106/110) and 70.9% (78/110) while corrective osteotomy was preferred by 1.8% (2/110) and 26.4% (29/110) of respondents for the mild and the severe stable slips respectively (P<0.0001). Surgeons preferring osteotomy are more likely to perform an intracapsular technique. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral normal hip was performed by 27.3% (30/110) of participants. There are significant differences in opinions between BSCOS members as to the optimal management of SCFE in children. This reflects the variable recommendations and quality in the current scientific literature. Further research is therefore required to determine best practice and enable consensus to be reached.
Purpose. We share our experience in management of failed in-situ pinning in severe unstable
The aim of this study was to determine whether
an osteoplasty of the femoral neck performed at the same time as an
intertrochanteric Imhäuser osteotomy led to an improved functional
outcome or increased morbidity. A total of 20 hips in 19 patients
(12 left, 8 right, 13 male, 6 female), who underwent an Imhäuser
intertrochanteric osteotomy following a slipped capital femoral
epiphysis were assessed over an eight-year period. A total of 13
hips in 13 patients had an osteoplasty of the femoral neck at the
same time. The remaining six patients (seven hips) had intertrochanteric
osteotomy alone. The mean age was 15.3 years (13 to 20) with a mean
follow-up of 57.8 months (15 to 117); 19 of the slips were severe
(Southwick grade III) and one was moderate (grade II), with a mean
slip angle of 65.3° (50° to 80°); 17 of the slips were stable and
three unstable at initial presentation. The mean Non-Arthritic Hip Scores
(NAHS) in patients who underwent osteoplasty was 91.7 (76.3 to 100)
and the mean NAHS in patients who did not undergo osteoplasty was
76.6 (41.3 to 100) (p = 0.056). Two patients required a subsequent
arthroplasty and neither of these patients had an osteoplasty. No
hips developed osteonecrosis or chondrolysis, and there was no increase
in complications related to the osteoplasty. We recommend that for
patients with a slipped upper femoral epiphysis undergoing an intertrochanteric
osteotomy, the addition of an osteoplasty of the femoral neck should
be considered. Cite this article:
We undertook a retrospective comparative study
of all patients with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis presenting
to a single centre between 1998 and 2011. There were 45 patients
(46 hips; mean age 12.6 years; 9 to 14); 16 hips underwent intracapsular
cuneiform osteotomy and 30 underwent pinning Pinning Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy may have a protective effect
on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay
of at least two weeks. The place of emergency pinning Cite this article: