Our aim was to assess the impact of the increasing number of patients on orthopaedic waiting lists on general practitioners in New Zealand. A 10-point questionnaire was developed in association with the General Practice Department at the Wellington School of Medicine, and mailed to 250 randomly chosen general practitioners around New Zealand. One hundred and fifty general practitioners returned the survey. Sixty three per cent of general practitioners reported having between eleven and thirty patients on an orthopaedic waiting list in their practice. 85% of general practitioners reported spending up to an extra 6 hours per month looking after problems caused by having to provide extra care for the patients. In 90% of cases general practitioners reported that their patients required considerably greater community support in the form of extra physiotherapy, meals-on-wheels and occupational therapy. In 138 cases, general practitioners reported greater levels of stress in the families of patients on waiting lists. The majority of general practitioners reported an increased need for analgesia and night sedation during the period on a waiting list. They also reported substantial increases in paperwork necessary to access social supports. This study documents the burden on general practitioners produced by the increasing waiting lists, and the re-alignment of waiting lists. This burden is reducing the general practitioner’s ability to deal with routine general practice problems, and likely adversely affects the health of other New Zealanders. There is a need for a study of patients on waiting lists to further assess their needs.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the incidence of heterotopic ossification following total hip replacement decreases with increasing experience of the surgeon. A comparison of the incidence of heterotopic ossification between 196 patients having primary total hip replacement in 1989–1990 and a second group of 180 patients between 1999–2000 was performed. The surgery was done by one surgeon. Radiographs taken at least six months post operatively were assessed, and graded using both the Hamblen and Brooker classification systems. No patients were given specific prophylaxis. The groups were well matched. There was a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of Grade 2 and 3 heterotopic ossification in the 1999–2000 patient group. There did not appear to be any identifiable reason for this except increased surgeon experience. The incidence in the 1999–2000 group was well below reported figures from other studies. The incidence of heterotopic ossification following total hip replacement is falling and the fall may be related to improved surgical technique.
The purpose was to define the economic and health costs of waiting for total hip joint replacement surgery. A prospective cohort of 122 patients requiring primary hip arthroplasty (HA) was recruited from four hospitals in the lower North Island. Health related quality of life (HRQL), using self-completed WOMAC questionnaires, was assessed monthly from enrolment pre-operatively to six months post surgery. Monthly cost diaries were used to record medical, personal and other costs. Data was analysed using PC-SAS to test the strength of associations between costs and waiting times, and changes in HRQL pre- and post-surgery. The mean waiting time was 5.2 months and mean cost of waiting for surgery was $1,376 per person per month (pp pm) with medical, personal and social costs contributing $404, $399, and $573, respectively. Waiting more than 6 months was associated with an increased cost of $730 pp pm for a total cost of $2177 pp pm (p<
0.003). Age was correlated with greater loss of income (<
65 years) (p=0.001) and higher medical costs (<
65 years) (p=0.08). An incremental improvement over time in WOMAC scores post-operatively was identified (p=0.0001). Older age (p=0.01), community services card use (p=0.003) and a greater number of months waiting (p=0.1) were negatively correlated with post-surgical improvement after adjusting for other variables. Longer waits for HA incur greater economic costs and impact on patient recovery. This lends weight to the view that a shorter waiting time for HA significantly reduces costs to individuals and society and improves health outcomes.
The aim of the study was to investigate functional outcomes and perceptions of quality of life in a series of elderly patients who have sustained tibial plateau fractures. A retrospective survey of all patients aged over 60 years who were admitted to Wellington and Hutt hospitals for treatment of a tibial plateau fracture between July 1996 and December 2000 was carried out. Patients were sent the Oxford 12 knee score and the Nottingham Health profile (NHP) by mail. Radiographs were reviewed to confirm fracture type and medical notes reviewed to ascertain treatment. Patients were divided into non-operative (plaster cast or brace; n=8) and operative treatment (open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or total knee replacement; n=15) groups. Of 42 eligible patients, 23 returned completed questionnaires (rr=55%). The mean age of patients was 73.6 years with 16 (69.6%) females and 7 (30.4%) males. Mean time to follow up was 38.7 +/−14.5 months. The mean Oxford 12 knee score was 39.3. The mean NHP-part I scores were 17.6, 8.4, 3.3, 14.4, 2.9, 9.3 for energy level, pain, emotional reaction, sleep, social isolation and physical mobility respectively. 73% of the patients felt that their present state of health was not causing problems with any of the activities mentioned in the NHP-part II. The perceptions of outcomes of tibial plateau fractures in the elderly after conservative treatment is comparable with operative treatment. The results show Oxford 12 Knee and NHP scores similar to other studies and indicate satisfactory knee function.
Early discharge from hospital has the potential to reduce direct costs, but may result in patients being discharged without adequate preparation for a return to the community. This qualitative study aimed to investigate patient expectations of and satisfaction with in-hospital discharge planning after hip arthroplasty in early and late discharge patient groups. A prospective study of 33 consecutive patients requiring hip arthroplasty were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in the lower North Island. Participants were interviewed using in-depth, semi-structured interviews on the day of discharge from hospital and again four-eight weeks later. Comparative analysis of the interviews from patients in early and late discharge groups was made. Findings reveal good levels of satisfaction with discharge planning for patients in both early and late discharge groups, facilitated by the opportunity to attend a pre-assessment clinic. Discharge planning was viewed as a partnership between patients and key members of the multi-disciplinary team. While written information provided was timely, restricted opportunity for dialogue with health professionals limited patient knowledge and understanding of recovery. Different needs of participants indicate that discharge planning needs to be tailored and more responsive to individuals. The role of health professionals as a mentor-coach is pivotal. Further interaction from health professionals, as a follow-up to written information provided may be a way to improve the discharge process and lead to more consistent outcomes.
For patients who had sustained a subcapital fracture (n=117), 21% (P<
0.05) of those who had been treated with cannulated screws required further surgery compared with 2–14% who had the other types of surgery.