Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a physically demanding procedure where the surgeon is subject to fatigue with increased energy expenditure comparable to exercise[1]. Robotic technologies have been introduced into operating rooms to assist surgeons with ergonomically challenging tasks and to reduce overall physical stress and fatigue[2]. Greater exposure to robotic assisted training may create efficiencies that may reduce energy expenditure[3]. The purpose of this study was to assess surgeon energy expenditure during THA and perceived mental and physical demand. 12 THAs (6 cadavers) randomized by BMI were performed by two surgeons with different robotic assisted experience. Surgeon 1 (S1) had performed over 20 robotic assisted THAs on live patients and Surgeon 2 (S2) had training on 1 cadaver with no patient experience. For each cadaver, laterality was randomized and manual total hip arthroplasty (MTHA) was performed first on one hip and robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) on the contralateral hip. A biometric shirt collected surgeon data on caloric energy expenditure (CEE) throughout acetabular reaming (AR) and acetabular implantation (AI) for each THA procedure. Surgeon mental and physical demand was assessed after each surgery. Scores were reported from 1–10, with 10 indicating high demand. A paired sample t-test was performed between MTHA and RATHA within each surgeon group with a confidence interval of (α =0.05).Introduction
Methods
The failure rate of Total Hip Replacement (THR) has been shown to be strongly influenced by the nature of the articulating interfaces, with Metal-on-Metal (MoM) articulations having three times the failure rate of Metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP) components. It has been postulated that this observation is related to edge wear and increased bearing torque of large MoM heads, which would lead to increased loading and wear at the head taper junction and, subsequently, to the release of metal ions and corrosion products. This suggests that taper wear and corrosion should not be as prevalent in large head MoP implants as in large head MoM implants. This study was undertaken to test the hypotheses that: (i) MoM implants exhibit higher rates of corrosion and fretting at the head taper junction than MoP implants, and that (ii) the severity of corrosion and fretting is greater in components of larger head diameter. Our study included 90 modular implants (41 MoM; 49 MoP) retrieved during revision hip arthroplasties performed between 1992 and 2012. Only retrievals with head diameters greater than 32 mm were included, and trunnion sizes ranged from 10/12 mm to 14/16 mm with 12/14 mm being the most common size. The stem trunnion and head taper surfaces were examined under stereomicroscope by a single observer. Each surface was scored for both corrosion (using a modified Goldberg scoring system) and fretting (using the standard Goldberg scoring system). For both the trunnion and head tapers, the student's t-test was used to determine if differences exist in the severity of corrosion or fretting between the MoM and MoP groups and between different head sizes of the same articulation type.Introduction
Materials and Methods
