Surgical management of acetabular fractures in older patients remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of primary THA with outcomes after THA for acute acetabular fractures (aTHA) as well as outcomes following delayed THA (dTHA) following prior acetabular fracture. We analyzed data from a large, national administrative claims database containing diagnostic, procedural, and demographic records from over 157 million patients. We identified all patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty THA continuously enrolled in the database at least 2 years prior and after the index procedure. Patients with an initial diagnostic code for acetabular fracture occurring the same day as the THA were classified as acute acetabular fractures. Patients with an initial acetabular fracture diagnostic code occurring at least 6 months before THA were classified as chronic acetabular fractures. The comparator group was patients undergoing THA with no history of acetabular fracture. There were 426,734 patients undergoing primary THA, 235 patients undergoing aTHA and 1,255 patients undergoing dTHA. Patients with an aTHA had higher complication rates, including revisions (9.8% vs 5.6%,), dislocations (8.9% vs 6.4%), and periprosthetic fracture (5.1% vs 2.3%) compared to dTHA. After adjusting for age, sex, region, and comorbidities, receiving an aTHA increased the odds of revision (OR = 3.65 [95% CI: 2.30–5.49]), dislocation (OR = 4.09 [95% CI: 2.53–6.27]), and periprosthetic fracture (OR = 4.29 [95% CI: 2.26–7.36]) compared to primary THA. Receiving a dTHA significantly increased the odds of revision (adjusted OR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.40–2.27]), dislocation (adjusted OR = 2.50 [95% CI: 1.97–3.13]), and periprosthetic fracture (adjusted OR = 1.99 [95% CI: 1.34–2.83]) compared to primary THA. Patients undergoing aTHA in the treatment of an acetabular fracture have significantly increased rates of revision, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation compared to dTHA and primary THA.
The long-term survival of modern ceramic-ceramic bearings in young active patients with osteonecrosis undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unknown. A previously published study of this series at 5-year follow-up demonstrated an extremely high activity level. The purpose of this study is to examine whether this very high activity level is associated with ceramic-on-ceramic THA failure at long-term follow-up. This is a retrospective review of a single-surgeon at an academic medical center between years 2003–2010. Inclusion criteria were consecutive series of ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in patients younger than 50 with a diagnosis of osteonecrosis. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (range 10–17). Data was collected via mail, telephone, and e-mail surveys. Exclusion criteria included deceased prior to follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and University of California at Los Angeles Activity scores (UCLA) were collected. Student t-tests were used as appropriate.Introduction
Methods
The obesity epidemic is a growing problem and must be considered with the projected increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous studies have reported increased complication rates after THA in the obese population, which has led to hesitation in offering surgery to this population. Moreover, some insurers are denying coverage for morbidly obese patients. While many consider obesity a “modifiable” risk factor, very few patients with advanced osteoarthritis have successfully lost substantial weight. The experience of centers that utilize systematic preoperative risk stratification tools and standardized postoperative total joint pathways may be underrepresented in prior studies. The aim of this study is to describe one surgeon's experience performing THA in morbidly and super-obese patient populations using an institutional preoperative Risk Stratification Tool (RST) and total joints pathway. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between May 2014 and December 2017 performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary care referral center. All patients were assessed preoperatively using an institutional RST and had a minimum of 90-day postoperative follow up. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): non-obese (BMI < 30), obese (30–34), severely obese (35–39), morbidly obese (40–44), and super-obese (≥ 45). Primary outcomes were inpatient and 90-day complications. Continuous and binary parameters were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. Logistic regression was additionally utilized to evaluate outcomes by BMI cohort.Introduction
Methods
