Introduction

Acetabular bone deficiency presents one of the most challenging problems during revision hip arthroplasty. A variety of surgical options and techniques are available including impaction bone grafting. We present our medium to long-term experience of 68 consecutive hips in 64 patients who had acetabular revision using impacted cancellous bone grafting with bone cement with a mean follow up of 10.5 ±3.75) years (range 5.1 to 17.7 years).

Femoral impaction grafting with cancellous bone and cement is an important technique in reconstituting deficient bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. We report the medium to long term results of 75 consecutive patients using a collarless, polished, tapered femoral stem with an average age of 68 (±11.4) years and a mean follow up of 10.5 (±2.4) years (range 6.3 to 14.1 years).

The median Endoklinik pre-operative bone defect score was 3 (IQR: 2–3) with a median subsidence at 1 year of 2mm (IQR: 1–3mm). At the most recent follow-up (mean 10.5±2.4 years), the median Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 80.6 (IQR: 67.6–88.9) and median subsidence 2mm (IQR: 1–4mm). Ten-year survivorship with any further femoral operation as an endpoint was 92%. Four prostheses required further revision.

Subsidence of the Exeter stem continued, albeit at a slower rate after the first year and was related to the Endoklinik pre-operative bone loss (p=0.037). The degree of subsidence at 1 year was a strong predictor of long term subsidence (p<0.001). Neither subsidence nor bone stock were related to long term outcome (HHS). There was a correlation between previous revision surgery and a poor Harris Hip Score (p=0.028) and those who had undergone previous revision surgery for infection had a higher risk of complications (p=0.048).

The good long term results of this technique commend its use in revision hip arthroplasty for patients with poor femoral bone stock.

Introduction: Upper limb injuries in road traffic accidents (RTAs) have been sparsely investigated and poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to obtain more specific information on upper limb injuries sustained by front seat occupants in car accidents with a view to identifying injuries that are a priority for prevention and further research.

Methods: With ethical approval and after obtaining identification of cases from the Transport and Research Laboratory the appropriate hospital records and radiographs were reviewed. Data were analysed to identify the frequency and severity of upper limb injuries, the mechanism of injury and the impairment sustained in accordance with the American Medical Association guide. The costs of management of the upper limb injury and that for the patient in total were calculated.

Results: Sixty cases were reviewed (29 male), aged 18–83 years (mean 45 years). There were 19 clavicle fractures of which 17 were right sided, two requiring operative intervention. These injuries were attributed to a “seat-belt” effect. The mean upper limb Abbreviated Injury Score was 1.9 and the overall Injury Severity Score ranged from 1 to 50 (median 12.3). Upper extremity sensory deficit ranged from 0 to 9% and motor deficit 0 to 22.5% giving up to 5% sensory and 13.5% motor “whole person impairment”. The wrist generally suffered a poorer functional outcome compared with the elbow. The mean estimated treatment cost for upper limb management was £2,200 compared with a total injury treatment cost of £11,000 per person.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates the significance of upper limb injuries in road traffic accidents and the data has been used in conjunction with crash dynamics data to formulate recommendations for future car safety and further research.