Abstract
Introduction This study aims to improve knee arthroplasty prosthetic alignment by determining if an algorithm based on establishing the most prominent points on the medial and lateral malleolion 3D CT scans can be used to establish the true center of the ankle joint.
Methods Axial, coronal and sagittal multi-planar reconstructions were generated on 20 ankles. Two observers independently identified the most prominent medial and lateral malleolar points, in the coronal plane, and the highest talar dome point, in the sagittal plane. Ratios were calculated comparing total intermalleolar distance to distance to medial and lateral malleolus, and the ratio of medial to lateral distance. The distance from the true center of the joint, in the sagittal plane, to the computer calculated center was determined. Statistical analysis using ANOVA, paired t-tests and regression analysis was performed. There were 17 normal ankles, two arthritic ankles, and one previously fractured ankle.
Results In the coronal plane there was a strong correlation between the measurements of each observer. The mean intermalleolar distance was 70.2 mm (95% CI 68.3–72.0). The strongest correlation was seen in the ratio of lateral distance to total distance (r=0.728) which was 0.57 in normal ankles (95% CI 0.55–0.58). The ratio for arthritic ankles was 0.48 (95% CI 0.46–0.50) and for the fractured ankle 0.57 (95% CI 0.15–0.99). These were significantly different at the five percent level (p< 0.02). The normal ankle ratio was substantiated by regression analysis. There was a poor correlation between the individual measurements in the sagittal plane (r=0.218). The mean distances from the calculated line to the true center were not statistically different with the true center always lying posterior to the calculated line (4.2 mm (95% CI 2.5–5.9) and 2.8 mm (95% CI 1.7–3.8) posterior. For the combined data this means that the mean distance that the true center of the ankle joint’s from a line joining the medial and lateral malleoli is 3.2 mm (95% CI 2.3–4.0 mm). The data was reproducible with a small standard deviation in each plane. Assuming a 300 mm tibial length, angular error in tibial alignment generated by a computer navigation system is less than one degree in both planes.
Conclusions The algorithm presented can give accurate measurements of normal ankle joints in knee navigation surgery.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.
None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.
