Abstract
Since several spinal conditions are currently treated with spinal fusion, alternatives to autogenous bone graft in spinal surgery have been under study for many years. Results have shown that, compared to other non.-spinal conditions, such as filling bone cavities, spinal fusion, in particular posterolateral fusion, is much more challenging due to the reduced area of the graft bed. As a result, most of the bone substitutes are still under investigation and their effectiveness in the clinical setting has yet to be demonstrated.
In recent years the authors analysed several bone graft substitutes using an animal model which has been widely used in experimental spinal fusion. In particular, porous ceramics have been used alone or with osteoin-ductive material such as fresh bone marrow or cultured mesenchymal stem cells. The results of these studies have shown that with ceramic alone a percentage of solid fusion similar to that with autogenous bone graft cannot be achieved. However, compared to the latter, more favorable results have been obtained when ceramics are loaded with mesenchymal stem cells. The addition of fresh bone marrow to ceramics also increases the fusion rates; however, in this case new bone formation was mainly found in the peripheral portions of the graft and to a lesser extent than when cultured mesenchymal stem cells were used.
