Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DIGITAL THREE FEET STANDING FILMS POST TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT: A USEFUL INVESTIGATION OR A SUPERFLUOUS RADIOLOGICAL INDULGENCE?



Abstract

Introduction: The advent of digital radiological technology affords orthopaedic surgeons with the opportunity to better assess prosthetic alignment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a post-operative digitalised 3-foot standing film better helps the surgeon than the standard weight-bearing short analogue antero-posterior film.

Materials and Methods: A single surgeon’s series of 68 consecutive patients were included in this prospective study. The axial alignment, mechanical, anatomical axes and distance of the post-operative mechanical axis from the centre of the knee, of 71 total knee replacements were determined using computer software on digital 3 feet standing films (Agfa ADC-2S system). These results were compared to similar measures determined using a goniometer and standard short standing analogue antero-posterior films. Both sets of results were compared to the intra-operative distal femoral valgus cut used by the surgeon.

Results: Sixty-eight patients, 71 knees, average 68.1 (range 42–85) years were included in this study. The average length of time from surgery to complete radiological evaluation was 18.9 (range 2–40 months). A mean difference of 1.20 degrees was found between the valgus angles measured on digital long and standard short radiographs. This difference was statistically significant p< 0.05. Comparing both sets of films revealed a Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.65. Comparing the valgus angle determined on the digital 3 foot standing film to the intra-operative valgus cut revealed a Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.388, this figure compares to a correlation co-efficient of 0.240 when the standard short films are used. The postoperative mechanical axis was found to be on average 7.34 (range 0.0 – 30.6) mm from the centre of the knee and the implants were positioned on average 89.8° to the mechanical axis on digitalised films, both these measures were indeterminable on the short standard films.

Conclusion: Three-foot digital standing antero-posterior films are more accurate and better correlate with the surgeon’s pre-operative aims than standard short antero-posterior standing radiographs. Only digital films allow for accurate determination of the post-operative mechanical axis. Despite not using expensive computer aided navigation systems intra-operatively, implant positioning was very satisfactory. Short films are adequate for routine assessment of total knee replacements postoperatively but digital 3-foot standing films afford better accuracy and are preferable for research purposes.

The abstracts were prepared by Emer Agnew. Correspondence should be addressed to Irish Orthopaedic Association, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11, Ireland.