Abstract
Introduction and Aims: Recently alternate approaches for intra-medullary femoral nailing have been advocated, including retrograde nailing and trochanteric start point antegrade nailing in an attempt to avoid damage to the hip abductor muscles that may occur during access to the piriformis fossa. The aim of this study was to document the hip abductor muscle strength following standard antegrade intra-medullary nailing utilising two different objective measures.
Method: Twenty-two patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures who were treated with standard ante-grade reamed interlocking intra-medullary nailing and who had a minimum one-year follow-up were identified. The patients were examined for muscle strength, range of motion and limb length. All of the patients answered a questionnaire and completed the SF-36 and Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment outcome measures. All patients had isokinetic muscle testing of their hip abductors, hip extensors and knee extensors using the KinCom muscle testing machine. Eleven of the patients also underwent formal gait lab analysis.
Results: Isokinetic muscle testing showed no significant difference from the uninjured contralateral side in hip abduction, hip extension or knee extension. The gait lab analysis failed to show any important changes in gait pattern in the time spatial and hip moment parameters. SF-36 scores were comparable to norms (mean physical component score 53 and mean mental component 51). MFA scores did not indicate any significant long-term disability.
Conclusion:Antegrade reamed interlocking intra-medullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures utilising a standard piriformis fossa starting point is not associated with any significant long-term hip abductor muscle strength deficit. Gait pattern returns to normal following femoral shaft fracture treated with this technique and functional outcomes are good.
These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
None of the authors is receiving any financial benefit or support from any source.