Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

RETROGRADE INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING OF SUPRA- AND PERCONDYLAR FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL FEMUR

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Object: We performed retrograde nailing of type C fractures and periprothetic percondylar fractures of the distal femur using a new dedicated femoral implant (T2 Supra-Condylar Nail). Herewith a powerful tool for the treatment of complex very distal femoral fractures was created. This nail has four distal locking holes placed from 6 to 32 mm at the end of the nail for a 3 plane fixation.

We present the new implant and the preliminary clinical outcome in 25 cases.

Methods: A consecutive series of 24 patients with 25 fractures of the distal femur (6 fractures AO type A, 1 type B, 12 type C fractures and 6 periprothetic fractures) was operated between January 2003 and September 2004. The epidemiology was typical for trauma patients with 18 male and 6 female patients. The mean age was 50.8 years (range 21–92 ys). The bone stock was osteopenic in 9 cases and regular in 16 cases. There were 6 patients who sustained polytrauma, 5 paraplegic patients fell out of their wheelchair. The remaining 13 patients suffered isolated injuries.

The patients were followed up clinically and radiographically.

Results: Seven patients were stabilized intramedullary at the day of the accident, 11 patients in the next 5 days. The remaining 6 fractures were initially stabilized with an external fixator in case of multiple injury. 7 percondylar fractures were stabilized with a short nail of 200 mm in cases of implants in the proximal femur (hip prosthesis: 3, DHS: 2, gamma nail: 2).

Mean duration of operation was 106 minutes.

The retrograde nailing using the T2 implant is a good suitable method performing a correct reposition of the fragments with high primary stability. There were no problems in woundhealing at all. Postoperatively a wheightbearing mobilisation with 20kg was possible and range of motion was unlimited.

Radiographs showed better ossification compared with plate osteosynthesis. Only one nail is broken out and needed a corrective operation with a plate. We saw no greater X- or O-deformity or rotation divergence. Only in 3 cases of delayed union, a spongioaplasty was indicated.

Conclusions: The retrograd nailing of distal femoral fractures type A is well accepted. After changing a C fracture in A fracture, it is also possible to stabilize complex intraarticular fractures intramedullarly. If a stabile metaphyseal block of minimal 3,5 centimeter is present after anatomical reconstruction of the joint, even in cases of osteoporotic bone stock, a intramedullary nailing is possible. Also in cases of periprothetic fractures with a short metaphyseal block of the distal femur, the T 2 supracondylar nail with its 4 locking screws at the end of the nail can stabilize this block in a 3 plane fixation.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.