Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A 2 TO 12 YEAR FOLLOW UP



Abstract

Aim: To review results and complications of revision knee replacements.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 41 cases of cemented revision knee arthroplasty in 39 patients (15 male, 24 female) performed between 1993 and 2003. Data regarding clinical and functional outcomes and complications was recorded.

Results: Mean age at index (revision) operation was 67.8 years (32 to 86) and mean follow-up was 6.8 years (1.5 to 12). Average time to revision was 80 months (9 months to 23 years).

The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in 16 cases, and deep sepsis in 13 cases, (12 were done in 2 stages). Others included polyethylene wear in 4 knees, instability in 2, and 1 each of peri-prosthetic fracture, implant breakage and pain of undetermined origin. 3 revisions were performed for failed Link Lubinus patello-femoral replacement. Mean interval between staged procedures for sepsis was 2 months.

Reconstruction was performed using the Kinemax Revision system with the use of augments and stems. The modular rotating hinge was used in 4 cases. Surgical exposure included additional lateral release in 7 cases, tibial tubercle osteotomy in 4 and quadriceps snip in one.

Complications: Included 1 post-operative death due to haematemesis and 2 non-fatal cardiac complications. 1 patient was re-revised for aseptic loosening at 3.5 years, 1 needed an above knee amputation for intractable sepsis after multiple failed reconstructions and 1 is awaiting patellar revision.

At latest review, 7 patients had died due to unrelated causes with a pain free functioning knee prosthesis. Of the remaining 31, 26 patients had none or minimal pain. 21 were independently mobile with a satisfactory range of motion.10 patients needed a walking stick.

Conclusion: Revision total knee replacement can give satisfactory results in the short to medium term, although the complication rate can be significant. The procedure should be performed in specialist units. Revision in 2 stages for sepsis resulted in satisfactory control of infection in our study.

Honorary Secretary – Mr Roger Smith. Correspondence should be addressed to BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35 - 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN