Abstract
Purpose of the study: The reversed total shoulder prosthesis is one of the treatments currently proposed for excentered glenoid osteoarthritic degeneration with massive rotator cuff tears. In light of the mediocre or at best highly variable results obtained with osteosynthesis or humeral arthroplasty for four-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus, indications for the reversed total shoulder prosthesis have been widened to include this category of traumatology patients. The purpose of this prospective study was to report outcome with the reversed prosthesis used for complex fracture of the proximal humerus in subjects aged over 70 years.
Material and methods: Ten patients, mean age 76 years, underwent surgery performed by the same surgeon to insert a Delta (DePuy) reversed prosthesis for four-fragment complex displaced fracture of the proximal humerus. The deltopectoral approach was used for all patients. The rotator cuff status was assessed intraoperatively. Clinical (Constant score) and radiological assessment were noted at 24 months.
Results: During the operation, only three of the ten shoulders presented a full thickness rotator cuff tear. One patients developed a complication requiring revision: early dislocation revised with a retaining polyethylene insert without recurrent dislocation. There were no cases of glenoid loosening at last follow-up. The weighted Constant score was 65/100. A pain-free shoulder was achieved in all ten patients. Anterior elevation was 130° on average, internal rotation reached hand to buttocks and active external rotation 20°.
Discussion: In patients aged over 70 years presenting a complex four-fragment fracture of the proximal humerus, the reversed prosthesis enables improved function and restoration of satisfactory joint movement. Early postoperative recovery and the gain in pain relief are encouraging factors. There was however unsatisfactory restoration of active rotation. For the elderly subject, free of a massive rotator cuff tear, rapid recovery after insertion of an reversed prosthesis should be balanced against the possible preservation of active rotations with an anatomic prosthesis.
Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.