Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OC21 HOW DO BMD, FRACTURE SEVERITY AND CEMENT TYPE INFLUENCE THE BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF VERTEBROPLASTY?



Abstract

Introduction: We have shown that vertebroplasty increases stiffness and partly restores normal load-sharing in the human spine following vertebral fracture. The present study investigated how this restorative action is influenced by type of cement injected, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture severity.

Methods: Fifteen pairs of thoracolumbar motion-segments (51–91 yrs) were loaded on a hydraulic materials testing machine to induce vertebral fracture. One from each pair underwent vertebroplasty with polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cement, the other with a biologically- active resin (Cortoss). Specimens were then creep loaded at 1.0kN for 2 hours. At each stage of the experiment, bending and compressive stiffness were measured, and ‘stress’ profiles were obtained by pulling a pressure-sensitive needle through the disc whilst under 1.5kN load. Profiles indicated the intradiscal pressure (IDP) and neural arch compressive load (FN). BMD was measured using dual photon X-ray absorptiometry. Severity of fracture was quantified from height loss. Changes were compared using repeated measures ANOVA.

Results: Fracture reduced bending and compressive stiffness by 31% and 41% respectively (p< 0.0001), and IDP by 43%–62%, depending upon posture (p< 0.001). In contrast, FN increased from 14% to 37% of the applied load in flexion, and from 39% to 61% in extension (p< 0.001). Following vertebroplasty, these effects were significantly reversed, and in most cases persisted after creep-loading. No differences were observed between PMMA- and Cortoss-injected specimens. The decrease in IDP and increase in FN after fracture were correlated with BMD in flexion and with height loss in extension (p< 0.01). After vertebroplasty, restoration of IDP and FN in flexion were correlated with their loss after fracture (p< 0.01). The former was also related to BMD (p< 0.05).

Conclusions: Changes in spinal load-sharing following fracture were partially restored by vertebroplasty, and this effect was independent of cement type. The effects of fracture and vertebroplasty on spinal load-sharing were influenced by severity of fracture, and by BMD.

These findings suggest that people with more severe fractures and low BMD may gain most mechanical benefit from vertebroplasty.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.