Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATIONTHERAPY IN SURGERY FOR SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS



Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy in soft-tissue sarcomas is still a controversial issues regarding indications, patients selection and treatment protocols. In the last fifteen years (1990–2005) at our Institution more than 600 patients affected by soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs and superficial trunk were surgically treated. Among these patients, 49 received preoperative chemotherapy (epirubicin plus ifosfamide, according to Italian Sarcoma Group protocol), associated to preoperative conventional external beam radiationtherapy in 36 cases (73.5%). The histologic types were liposarcoma (30,6%), synovial sarcoma (20,4%), fibrosarcoma (16,3%), pleomorphic sarcoma or malignant fibrous histiocitoma (12,1%), leiomyosarcoma (8,2%), other histotypes (12,1%). Tumor size was 10 cm or larger in 21 cases, 6 to 9 cm in 23 patients and 5 cm or smaller in 5 cases. Neoplasms were high-grade (Broders grade 3 or 4) in all cases but five.

After neoadjuvant treatment we performed a limb-sparing surgical excision of the tumor in 47 patients (96%), while a primary amputation of the limb was necessary in only two cases (4.1%). A vascularized miocutaneous flap was used in 8 cases, and adequate surgical margins were achieved in more than 70% of the cases.

Postoperative chemotherapy was given in 26 cases (53%), postoperative radiotherapy just in 5 (10%). We report the outcome data on these 49 cases, regarding overall survival, local or distant relapse, local and systemic complications, early and long-term limb salvage rate.

According to histologic examination of the resection specimen, average percent of necrosis after neoadjuvant treatment was 70.6% (range 30 – 99%). Wound dehiscence occurred in 6 patients but ultimately healed succesfully in all of them.

At an average follow-up of 23 months (range 3 – 82), 37 patients were continuously disease free (76%), two patients had local recurrence (one amputated), four patients were alive with metastatic disease, five patients had died with disseminated disease (at 4, 19, 28, 37 and 61 months after surgery), one patient had died of unrelated disease.

Due to the inconstant tumor response, neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue tumors is still a controversial issue. On the basis of data presently available, we think that it can be a useful treatment in high-risk tumors (larger than 5 cm; high grade). In these cases, at a low and acceptable rate of local complications, the conjoined use of preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy can help to make a limb-salvage surgery possible and at the same time can maybe reduce the risk of distant metastasis.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland