COMPARISON OF PROPRIOCEPTION AND RANGE OF MOTION AFTER THE LOW CONTACT STRESS ANTEROPOSTERIOR GLIDE (LCS AP GLIDE) AND ROTATING PLATFORM (LCS RP) KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMISED DOUBLE BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate and compare the effects of two types of LCS total knee arthroplasty on joint proprioception and range of motion.

Methods: 47 patients were randomised to receive either a LCS AP glide or Rotating platform prosthesis. Clinical scores (Oxford knee score, American knee society score, EuroQol), range of motion and proprioception were assessed prior to and at 3,6, and 12 months after the operation. Proprioception was assessed in terms of absolute error angle (mean difference between the target angle and the response angle). Knee angles were measured in degrees using an electromagnetic tracking device, Polhemus 3Space Fastrak that detected positions of sensors placed on the test limb. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean of two groups (with a level of significance of p < 0.05).

Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of pre-operative range of motion, oxford knee score, American knee society score, EuroQol score and proprioception. There was statistically significant improvement in the Oxford knee score, AKSS and EuroQol score in both groups (p< 0.001), but there was no difference between the groups with respect to these parameters. There was improvement in the proprioception (reduction in absolute error angle) in both groups though this was not significant statistically (p> 0.05).

Conclusions: We did not find significant difference between AP glide and RP LCS knee arthroplasty in terms of improvement in proprioception and range of motion.