Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TENSION BAND WIRING OF TRANSVERSE FRACTURES OF PATELLA. HOW DOES FIBRE WIRE COMPARE WITH STAINLESS STEEL WIRE?



Abstract

Background: Tension Band wiring technique is commonly used to treat transverse patella fractures. The commonly used configuration has parallel K wires and a stainless steel wire loop oriented as a figure of 8. Use of non-metallic suture materials as reliable fixation materials have been reported. We investigated the properties of composite polyester suture (Fibre wire) when used in Tension band wiring of patella.

Methods: A wooden model of a transversely fractured patella was used. The fracture was fixed using two K wires and a loop of horizontally oriented stainless steel wire or fibre wire. Two wire twists placed at corners were used for SS wire loops. For fibre wire samples a tensioning device was used and the knots placed at one corner. Interfragmentary compression at the point of wire breakage and fracture displacement on physiologic cyclic loading was measured for each fixation construct. The reliability of tensioning device (Arthrex) and the effect of using multiple strands of wire were assessed.

Results: Use of the tensioning device produced interfragmentary compression that could be repeated reliably. The addition of a further strand increased the interfragmentary compression developed by 94%. There was no significant difference between interfragmentary compression developed between groups (p> 0.05). The average interfragmentary compression produced for three repetitions for the individual groups, Fibre wire (1394N), SS wire of 1.0mm diameter (1320N), SS Wire of 1.25mm diameter (1594N) were comparable. This increased significantly when a second loop of fibre wire was used (2566N). Permanent fracture displacement at physiologic loads were, Fibre wire (9.7mm, SD 2.7mm), SS wire of 1.0mm diameter (7.0mm, SD 1.0mm) and SS Wire of 1.25mm diameter (7.4mm, SD 2.3mm). The addition of the second strand of fibre wire decreased the displacement significantly (4.8mm, SD 0.6mm). The effect of second strand of fibre wire decreased the displacement by 97% while the decrease on addition of the second strand of stainless steel wire was only 14%.

Discussion: Interfragmentary compression produced to failure was comparable between a single strand of fibre wire, 1.0mm SS wire and 1.25mm SS wire, the commonly used SS wire diameters in fixation of fractured patella. The standard deviations of final permanent displacement were higher with the larger diameter of SS wire, indicating that the use of a thicker wire would require some preloading before it is uniformly tensioned. Amongst the SS wire diameters tested, 1.0mm resulted in least variations (SD 1.0mm).

The addition of second strand resulted in a marked improvement in displacement with Fibre wire and variations between different samples were smaller than in any other group tested (SD 0.6mm)

Conclusions:

  1. Fibre wire has similar strength to failure when compared the commonly used thickness of stainless steel wire for fixation of patella.

  2. Use of tensioning device produces interfragmentary compression in a reliable and reproducible manner.

  3. The addition of second loop of fibre wire, separately tensioned results in significant improvements in interfragmentary compression and resistance against displacement.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos A. Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Dept of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY