Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

PAPER 016: METAL-ON-METAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: FOUR TO TEN-YEAR RESULTS



Abstract

Purpose: Metal-on-metal articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been recently re-introduced for the treatment of osteoarthritis. There have been excellent short-term clinical outcomes reported. The long-term clinical results of these implants are still unknown. In this study, we examined the four to ten -year results of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at our institution.

Method: All patients receiving a metal-on-metal prosthesis were prospectively registered in a computerized database. The period July 1997 – May 2003 was selected for analysis. This group contained 251 cases (207 patients) and had an average follow-up of 6.8 years. Of the 251 implants the femoral head components were either Metasul (203) or Ultamet (48) and the acetubular component Fitek (12), Interop (191) or Pinnacle (48). All patients were assessed with the Harris hip and UCLA activity scores at routinely scheduled follow-up visits. The mean age of patients at surgery was 52 years (18 to 70 years old). The average follow-up was of 6.8 years (4.2–10 years). No patients were lost to follow-up.

Results: The mean UCLA and Harris hip score pre-operatively were 3.6 (1–8) and 42 (15–81), respectively. Values of the UCLA and the Harris hip scores on the most recent follow-up visit were 7.0 (60% of patients had a score equal to or greater than 7) and 85 (70% of patients had a score equal to or greater than 85), respectively. Thirteen hips (5.1%) were revised in total: 1 (0.4%) for early deep infection, 1 (0.4%) for revision of undersized stem and 11 (4.3%) for acetabular revisions due to manufacturing defects. Radiological results showed no osteolysis and 9 non-progressive radiolucency.

Conclusion: At four to ten year follow-up, metal-on-metal total hip replacement provides consistently good clinical and radiographic results with a low revision rate. They provide longstanding pain alleviation and improved function and activity levels in patients suffering from osteoarthritis.

Correspondence should be addressed to Meghan Corbeil, Meetings Coordinator Email: meghan@canorth.org