Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE WITH CUSTOM MADE (CAD-CAM) UNCEMENTED TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT AT A MINIMUM SEVENYEAR FOLLOW-UP



Abstract

Introduction: The use of custom made CAD-CAM femoral stems in primary Total Hip Replacement allows preservation of valuable bone stock in anatomically challenging femora whilst optimising biomechanics and improving function. The custom prosthesis design and manufacturing process is carried out with the aid of computed tomography (CT), a system of tomographic image processing, a Computer–Aided Design (CAD) system and a Computer–Aided Manufacturing (CAM) system.

Aim: To report seven year minimum follow up of a custom made and designed femoral component used in total hip replacement, focusing on clinical and radiographic evidence of failure.

Methods: Patients who had an uncemented total hip arthroplasty, by one of the two senior authors, with a CAD-CAM hip between February 1993 and February 2000 were retrospectively studied. An independent observer evaluated all patients radiologically using Engh’s criteria of osteointegration and clinically using Harris and Oxford Hip Scores.

Results: 85 patients (47 male, 38 female) (102hips) underwent THA for a variety of reasons between February 1993 and February 2000. Average age was 53.7 (25.4–91.5). Average follow up was 9.3 years (7–15). The aetiologies for THA were: Developmental Dysplasia of Hip (22 hips), Osteoarthritis (25), Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis (3), Skeletal Dysplasia (11), Trauma (9), Perthe’s Disease (6), Avascular Necrosis (14), Tumour (4) and other (8). At last follow up 4 hips had been revised: 2 for aseptic loosening, 1 for deep infection and 1 for excessive acetabular cup liner wear. 84 patients were evaluated (one deceased from unrelated causes). Average Harris Hip Score was 81 (range 53–96). Average Oxford Hip Score was 24 (range15–43). A full set of x-rays was available for 73 patients and when evaluated all were radiographically stable. Endosteal bone formation or spots welds were present on all 73 of the x-rays. Radiolucent lines at the bone-implant interface were present on 7/73 x-rays but did not correlate with clinical problems. There was no evidence of bone pedestal formation.

Conclusions: Clinical results are good to excellent with little radiographic evidence of failure. CAD-CAM hips can be safely and reliably used for a variety of aetiologies with predictable result at least up to seven years postoperatively.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org