Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR DISPLACED PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES, RESULTS OF TWO TYPES OF IMPLANTS



Abstract

Introduction: The goal of this study is to report the clinical and radiographic results of 2 types of implants used to treat 3 and 4 parts fractures of the proximal humerus.

Patients: Sixty-three patients (64 shoulders) were reviewed in this retrospective series. Forty women and 23 men were included, the mean age was 64 ± 12 (39–86). A group of 31 patients was managed with a ‘standard’ implant, a second group of 32 patients (33 shoulders) was managed with a ‘fracture’ implant. The delay between initial trauma and the surgical procedure was less than 4 weeks (1–30 days) for all patients.

Methods: All the procedures were carried out by a senior surgeon. The patients were reviewed by an independent observer with a mean follow-up of 59 ± 38 months (12–138) for a clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Results: In the ‘standard implant’ group; 84% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied regarding the outcome of surgery. The subjective evaluation (SSV score) was 69% (30–100%). The active anterior elevation (AAE) was 117° ± 43° (30–180°), the active external rotation (AER) was 24° ± 20° (0–60°), the active internal rotation (AIR) was up to the T12 vertebra (buttocks-T8). The mean Constant score was 60 ± 20 points (24–95). The radiographic analysis revealed a greater tuberosity that was considered migrated, not healed or lysed in 65% of cases. The acromion – implant height was ≤ 7mm in 52% of the patients. In the ‘fracture implant’ group; all the patients were satisfied or very satisfied regarding the outcome of the surgery. The SSV score was 70% (20–100%). The AAE was 132° ± 36° (45–180°), the AER was 34° ± 16° (0–60°), the AIR was up to the L3 vertebra (buttocks-T8). The mean Constant score was 66 ± 16 points (33–95). The radiographic analysis revealed a greater tuberosity that was considered migrated, not healed or lysed in 33% of cases. The acromion – implant height was ≤ 7mm in 30% of the patients. The patients with a healed greater tuberosity in an adequate position had better Constant scores: 71 points versus 54 points for those with a greater tuberosity not healed/lysed or in a bad position (p=0.03). A healed greater tuberosity in an adequate position was obtained more constantly for the patients in the ‘fracture implant’ group (p=0.02).

Conclusion: A healed greater tuberosity in an adequate position is a significant parameter influencing the outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. A fracture designed implant allows better greater tuberosity positioning and healing.

Correspondence should be addressed to: EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH – 8005 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: office@efort.org