Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TRABECULAR METAL VERSUS CEMENTED POLYETHYLENE. THE BONE DECIDES!



Abstract

Introduction: The ideal acetabular component has low wear, permanent fixation and physiological bone loading. Recently trabecular metal has been promoted as reproducing the modulus of trabecular bone with a cementless fixation. The aim of this trial was to see if a monobloc trabecular backed polyethylene acetabular component loaded the pelvis physiologically as a cemented polyethylene component.

Method: Between 2004 and 2006 54 patients were ran-domised to a cemented polyethylene acetabular component versus a monobloc trabecular backed polyethylene acetabular component. The primary outcome measurement was bone density in peri-prosthetic acetabular regions of interest measured preoperatively and post operatively at 6 weeks and 1 year. Secondary outcomes measured were radiographic and functional outcomes (HHS and Oxford score).

Results: Radiographically 8 patients in the trabecular group had a significant gap in zone II which resolved in 6 by 1 year. The cemented group had 3 patients with a radiolucent line (zone 1) at 1 year. HHS and OXFORD scores improved with no significant difference between the groups. Both groups had significant loss of bone density in the ilium and ischium. The trabecular group produced a significant increase in bone density in the superolateral region. The cemented group produced increased bone density in the superomedial region.

Discussions and Conclusions: There is a significant reduction in BMD for both groups in the upper pelvis and ischium in keeping with finite element modelling predictions. The press-fit group relative to the cemented group resulted in decreased BMD in the superomedial peri-prosthetic region. The trabecular monobloc cup therefore behaves more like a rigid cementless shell despite the properties of trabecular metal.

Correspondence should be addressed to BHS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.