Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ARTHRODESIS OF THE KNEE FOR SEPTIC TRAUMA SEQUELAE AND EXTENSIVE PERIARTICULAR BONE DEFECT – ACHIEVED BY BONE TRANSPORT WITH A CIRCULAR FRAME



Abstract

Introduction: Arthrodesis of the knee nowadays is used as a salvage procedure, commonly for patients with a failed TKR or in infected trauma cases. We present 4 patients with extensive bone defects following septic sequelae of trauma treated by Arthrodesis of the knee joint.

Materials and Methods: Four patients (avg. 46.5 years; range 37–57 years; three male and one female) with longstanding infected non-union fractures (3 months–2 years) at the knee joint (three Tibial plateau and one distal femur) were treated by initial debridement and removal of dead or infected bone. This led to substantial bone defects (6–12 cm) of the debrided bone at the knee joint. The patients then underwent bone transport with a circular frame to compensate for this bone defect before achieving an Arthrodesis of the knee joint. Three patients also had a free muscle flap for soft tissue coverage before bone transport was begun.

Results: Arthrodesis of the knee was achieved in all patients at an average time of 26 months (20–32 months). None of the patients have any active infection of the limb.

Discussion and Conclusions: Knutson et al (1984) said that massive bone loss may substantially reduce the success rate of Arthrodesis of the knee. Wilde and Stearns (1989) noted decreased fusion rates with greater degrees of bone loss. In our series the bone defects were a sequelae of infective non–union, this further complicates the healing process. However, using circular frame for Bone transport to overcome the defect and to achieve compression at the Arthrodesis site is a useful technique for such challenging cases.

Correspondence should be addressed to BLRS c/o BOA, at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, England.