Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

7.P.10 EVALUATION OF STABILITY OF ROTATING HINGE KNEE PROSTHESES: A BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS



Abstract

Introduction: Rotating hinge knee prostheses are designed to provide a stable knee reconstruction when the intrinsic soft-tissue stability of the knee had been lost as a result of tumor resection, multiple knee replacements, trauma or surgical reconstruction. Instability is the main risk factor for implant’s dislocation. We performed a biomechanical analysis to establish the association between design of the central rotational stem (length and taper) and the implant’s stability, using a self constructed biomechanical apparatus on a test bench in the laboratory.

Materials and Methods: The lengths and tapers of the central rotational stem of three different rotating hinge knee implants (LPS/M.B.T. (DePuy)-cylindrical, length: 46mm, taper: 0°; S-ROM Noiles (DePuy) -conical, length: 46mm, taper: 5°; GMRS (Howmedica) -cylindrical, length: 47mm, taper: 0°) were measured using a self-constructed biomechanical testing device. The degree of tilting of the central rotational stem within the vertical post-in channel by extending the distraction was measured as well the maximum amount of distraction before the stem’s dislocation.

Results: The GMRS implant design was superior to the LPS/M.B.T. and the S-ROM Noiles implant design concerning stability and maximum amount of distraction before dislocation (38 vs. 27 vs. 26 mm). The GMRS system had a steep rising distraction-angular displacement curve until the dislocation at 38mm occurred while the laxity curve of S-ROM Noiles showed a poor increasement. Besides early high laxity it required only 26mm of distraction to dislocate.

Conclusions: Our conclusion is that rotating hinge prostheses with a short and markedly tapered central rotational stem have the highest instability/angular laxity at any given amount of distraction. Such knee prostheses should be used with caution in patients after excessive soft tissue resection. A long and cylindrical central rotational stem seems to prevent early instability and implant’s dislocation.

Correspondence should be addressed to Professor Stefan Bielack, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Bismarkstrasse 8, D-70176 Stuttgart, Germany. Email: s.bielack@klinikum_stuttgart.de