IS IT ACCEPTABLE TO PERFORM TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ARTHROPLASTY USING CONVENTIONAL METHODS IN ALL THE CASES? AN IMPLICATION OF NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FIELD – COMPUTER AIDED NAVIGATION

Abstract

Introduction: The knee joint replacement arthroplasty is a very successful procedure. Traditionally we aim to perform the arthroplasty and recreate the patients’ biomechanical axis and correct the coronal plain alignment deformity. Unfortunately till recently there was no fine way of controlling the exact alignment and depending on surgeon to surgeon, a valgus (to anatomical axis) of 3 to 7 degrees is aimed for using mechanical intra or extramedullary jigs. On proper measurements only 70–80% of knees achieve the aimed result at best as can be seen in the literature. With the advent of computer aided navigation we can now achieve the desired alignment in a much higher percentage of patients.

Material: We performed 1000 total knee arthroplasties at our hospital. Out of these 500 were performed using computer navigation and 500 using conventional mechanical jigs. Pre op and post op long leg alignment films were taken using standardised method. The data was collected using oxford scores and from computer navigation machines and plain radiographic analysis. The observers doing the radiographic analysis were blinded as to whether the patient had procedure done by conventional means or by computer navigation. Sub grouping of the deformities was done depending on the amount of deformity.

Results: 500 patients had the operation done by conventional means and the other 500 with computer navigation guidance. Further subgroups were made depending on the amount of pre-existing radiological deformity 0–5, 6–10, 11–15 and more than 15 degrees of varus or valgus deformity. The effect of gender, bmi, surgeon experience, clinical oxford score outcome was also considered. It was clear that the patients who had more severe deformities and valgus deformities had better post operative alignments after the procedure was performed with computer navigation as compared with the conventional means. There was statistically significant difference observed between the subgroups.

Discussion: Orthopaedic surgery has improved with technical advancements over the number of years. With any new procedure it takes a long time to shed the old beliefs and adapt the new concepts. While we have plenty of evidence in literature and from our study that computer navigation can give better desired alignment after total knee arthroplasty especially with more severe deformities, it still needs to be taken up by majority of orthopaedic surgeons. Ours is the first study to demonstrate the difference in the specific subgroups.