Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

240. TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES FIXED WITH A RECONSTRUCTION SCREW: RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA3™ AND THE PFN-A™ WITH ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT-SPECIFIC COMPLICATIONS



Abstract

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this work was to analyse the respective complications of nail fixations for trochanteric fractures. Since January 2005, we have used the Gamma3™ and the PFN-A™ in routine practice. These nails have evolved and we wanted to compare the latest generation models.

Material and methods: This was a prospective consecutive series of 426 files in a single centre (January 2005 to October 200) reviewed at mean 19 months (3–36 months). All patients with a fracture of the trochanter treated by osteosynthesis were included. Eight senior operators implanted Gamma3™ nails (4 operators) or PFN-A™ nails (4 operators). During this period, 236 Gamma3™ and 190 short PNF-A™ nails were implanted. The two cohorts were statistically comparable regarding: mean age, body weight, ASA score, preoperative autonomy, repair of fracture type.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two implants for: implant position (correct position for 80%), early mortality (5.5%), rate of sepsis (1.6%), which were comparable with the literature. In these two groups, the operative time was shorter than in the literature with an advantage for the PFN-A™ (40 min versus 35 min). Sliding was minimal (1.3% for Gamma3™ versus 1.1% for PFN-A™), as was revision (5.1% versus 4.7%). Conversely, the technical complications were implant dependent: defective automatic distal locking for the Gamma3™ (n=24, 10.2%) with fracture on nail for four patients, and protrusion of the cephalic blade for the PFN-A™ (n=11, 5.8%) due to insufficient impaction and to back glide after excessive distraction followed by impaction.

Discussion: There is a rich body of knowledge on the different nail and screw-plate models. Mean sliding is to the order of 4% and mean revision about 8–9%. We could not find a study comparing the new implant generations. These implants enable a reduction of the general complications for trochanteric surgery, but to ensure persistent results, care must be taken for the distal locking of the Gamma3™ and the intraoperative protrusion of the PFN-A™ blade.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ghislaine Patte at sofcot@sofcot.fr