Abstract
Introduction
Open fractures are managed in the UK guided by standards issued by the BOAST-4 standards. A study was undertaken to evaluate compliance with these standards in a regional trauma unit (MTU), and compared following upgrading to a Major Trauma Centre (MTC).
Methods
Compliance was assessed against 11 of the 15 BOAST-4 standards (7, 9, 10 and 15 were not assessed). Patients were included with open diaphyseal tibial fractures (AO 42-), admitted to the department in the year before and the year after the Major Trauma Centre opened.
Results
A total of 78 patients were evaluated; 30 within the MTU and 48 as a MTC. Of the 11 standards assessed, 6 (at least in part), achieved 100% compliance in the MTU study, and 5 in the MTC study. Compliance was poor for; antibiotic use in relation to definitive wound closure, formulating a joint plan, and undergoing surgery on a planned trauma list. In contrast, following MTC status antibiotic compliance had improved, as had evidence of joint planning, although antibiotic administration time on admission had declined. Consultant-level orthopaedic and plastic surgeon involvement at first intervention had improved, although plastic surgical input remained predominantly registrar-led. Time from injury to definitive stabilisation improved following MTS status
Discussion
This study demonstrates improvements in many aspects of care for open fracture since the MTC opened. However, further improvements can be made, particularly regarding the early treatment pathway. Since this audit a plastic surgeon with specific interest in lower limb reconstruction has been appointed.
