Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients with diabetic foot soft-tissue infection and osteomyelitis.
Methods
Medical records of patients with diabetic foot infection involving either soft-tissue (STI) or bone (OM) were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis was determined by bone culture, bone histopathology or imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT). Patient outcomes were recorded up to 1 year after admission.
Results
Out of 294 patients included in the study, 137 were diagnosed with STI and 157 had OM. No differences in age (p=.40), sex (p=.79), race (p=.83), body-mass index (p=.79) or type of diabetes (p=.77) were appreciated between groups. Frequency of comorbidities (neuropathy, chronic kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease) also did not differ except for increased prevalence of cardiac disease in patients with STI (86.9%) compared to those with OM (31.8%) (p<.00001) and decreased prevalence of retinopathy (24.8% vs. 35.7%) (p=.04). Patients with OM had greater C-reactive protein (p<.00001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p<.00001) and white blood cell count (p<.00001). Among 1-year outcomes, patients with OM more often underwent surgery (p<.00001), had lower limb amputations (p<.00001), became reinfected (p=.0007), were readmitted for the initial problem (p=.008), had longer time to healing (p=.03) and had longer hospital length of stay (p=.00002). However, no differences in 1-year mortality (p=1.000), overall 1-year readmission (p=.06) or healing within 1-year (p=.64) were appreciated.
Conclusion
In our study, OM was associated with more aggressive treatment, reinfection and longer time to healing than STI. However, despite being associated with more aggressive care and readmissions, patients with diabetic foot OM has similar 1-year mortality and healing rates to those with diabetic foot STI.
