EFFECT OF CEMENTLESS TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY (BMD): COMPARISON BETWEEN POROUS TITANIUM AND TANTALIUM TIBIAL COMPONENTS

Abstract

Cementless total knee replacement (TKR) is at the present date a controversial topic. Aim of the study was to compare the effect on tibial periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) between different implant materials and designs.

During the two-year period between January 2005 and December 2006, we analysed data of 45 patients who underwent consecutively cementless TKR (49 implants) at our Institution for primary osteoarthritis. Data was divided in 2 groups: A) 26 implants with tantalium tibial component (Zimmer NexGen Trabecular Metal^TM Monoblock); B) 23 implants with porous titanium tibial component (Lima MultiGen^TM). Data was comparable per sex, age, BMI, post-op alignment, post-op KSS > 75, absence of major post-op complications. Standard AP x-rays were taken 4 months post-op and 8 years post-op. In order to quantify the reduction of BDM, we determined using ImageJ (an open source software) the Mean Grey Value (MGV) of a specific area on the 4 months- and 8 yrs-postop AP x-rays.

Group A and Group B had an average MGV variation of, respectively, 11.79% and 10.51%; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Reduction of BMD in a TKR is known to be a biomechanical response to load and it is conditioned by the alignment of the components and their design. Our study shows that the different materials (porous titanium vs. tantalium), in relation to the different implant design, have a similar effect on the surrounding bone. The overall results show a valid osseointegration in both group of patients.