Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Childhood diseases involving the proximal femoral epiphysis often cause abnormalities that can lead to end-stage arthritis at a relatively young age and the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The young age of these patients makes hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) an alternative and favorable option due to the ability to preserve femoral bone.
Patients presenting with end-stage hip arthritis as sequelae of childhood diseases such as Legg-Calves-Perthes (LCP) and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) pose altered femoral anatomy, making HRA more technically complicated. LCP patients can result in coxa magna, coxa plana and coxa breva causing altered femoral head-to-neck ratio. There can also be acetabular dysplasia along with the proximal femoral abnormalities. SCFE patients have altered femoral head alignment. In particular, the femoral head is rotated medially and posteriorly, reducing the anterior and lateral offset. Additionally, many of these patients have retained hardware, making resurfacing more complicated.
We report findings of a cohort of patients, with history of either LCP or SCPE who underwent HRA to treat end-stage arthritis.
METHODS
Data was retrospectively collected for patients who had HRA for hip arthritis as a result of either LCP (n=67) or SCFE (n=21) between 2004 and 2014 performed by two surgeons. Demographic information, clinical examination and improvement was collected pre and postoperatively. Improvement was determined using Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and UCLA activity scores. Anteroposterior radiographs were measured pre and postoperatively to determine leg length discrepancy. Radiographs were inspected postoperatively for radiolucent lines, implant loosening and osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survivorship for freedom from reoperation for any reason was calculated. Paired student t-tests were used to compare groups.
RESULTS
The average age at the time of surgery was 44 years (11.8–68), with an average follow-up of 3.7 years (.22–11.2). Retained hardware was present in a total of 5 patients, 1 LCP and 4 SCFE. Preoperative HHS was 58.3 (33–83), which increased significantly to 94.9 (55–100) at the most recent postoperative timepoint (p<.0001). The most recent UCLA activity score was 7 (1–10). Average leg length discrepancy preoperatively was 7.5mm (0–20), which significantly improved to 0.6mm (0–7.5) postoperatively (p<.0001). At most recent follow-up, metal ion testing revealed median chromium level of 2.3 parts per billion (ppb, 1–7.7) and median cobalt level of 1.5 (0–9.2). There were three failures in the group with 1 LCP due to instability at 2.7 years, and 2 SCFE due to femoral neck fracture at 1 month in one and clinical failure due to unexplained pain at 5.5 years in one. Revision surgery was done in 2 patients, 1 LCP and 1 SCFE. Radiographic examination of all non-failure HRA patients revealed implants to be in good alignment with no indication of implant loosening at the most recent postoperative timepoint. Kaplan-Meier survivorship for freedom from revision was 96.2 at 5 years.
CONCLUSION
The findings demonstrated increase in functional outcomes in patients who underwent HRA for osteoarthritis associated with LCP and SCFE. There was no increase in complications including femoral neck fracture or implant loosening despite technical challenges of the procedure.
