Abstract
Introduction
Total hip replacement with metal-on-polymer (MoP) hip prostheses is a successful treatment for late-stage osteoarthritis. However, the wear debris generated from the polymer acetabular liners remains a problem as it can be associated with osteolysis and aseptic loosening of the implant. This has led to the investigation of more wear resistant polymers in orthopaedics. Cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) is now the gold-standard acetabular liner material. However, we asked if carbon fibre reinforced polyether ether ketone (CFR-PEEK) might be a lower wear material. In addition, we sought to understand the influence of contact stress on the wear of both XLPE and CFR-PEEK as this has not previously been reported.
Materials and Methods
A 50-station circularly translating pin-on-disc (SuperCTPOD) machine was used to wear test both XLPE and CFR-PEEK pins against cobalt chromium (CoCr) discs to investigate the influence of contact stress on their wear rates. Fifty XLPE and 50 CFR-PEEK pins were articulated against CoCr discs. The pins, 9 mm in outer diameter and 12 mm in height, were drilled with different diameter holes to generate different sized annuli and thus, different contact areas. The pins were tested at 1.10, 1.38, 1.61, 2.00 and 5.30 MPa, which are typical contact stresses observed in the natural hip joint. An additional pin for every test group was used as a control to track the lubricant uptake. The discs were polished to 0.015 μm Sa prior to testing. The test stations contained 16 ml of diluted newborn calf serum (protein concentration: 22 g/L). Wear was measured gravimetrically with a balance (resolution: 10 μm) every 500,000 cycles. A standardised cleaning and weighing protocol was followed.
Results and Discussion
The wear rates for the XLPE pins were calculated as 1.05, 0.90, 0.77, 0.48 and 0.28 mg/million cycles for the different pin stress groups respectively. The wear rates decreased with increasing contact stress, which was similar to what was observed for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). The change in weight of the discs was insignificant (p-value:0.85).
For the CFR-PEEK pin groups, the wear rates were calculated as 0.56, 0.65, 0.61, 0.58 and 0.65 mg/million cycles respectively. The difference between the wear rates was insignificant (p-value: 0.92). However, the weight of the discs decreased significantly (p-value: 0.00).
At 1.11 MPa and taking data for UHMWPE tested in the same way, comparison of the three polymers showed that CFR-PEEK produced the lowest wear against CoCr. Although the wear rates for CFR-PEEK were found to be the lowest, the decrease in weight of the CoCr discs articulated against CFR-PEEK was indicative of metallic wear.
Conclusion
CFR-PEEK should not be used against orthopaedic metals. XLPE articulating against CoCr was found to be the optimum combination, producing low wear without causing weight change from the counterface, under varying contact stresses.
