Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

USING PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY DIFFERENCES IN KNEE JOINT FUNCTION BETWEEN A NON-PATHOLOGICAL GROUP AND A PRE– HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY COHORT

The British Orthopaedic Research Society (BORS) Annual Meeting 2021, held online, 13–14 September 2021.



Abstract

Abstract

Objectives

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a useful method for analysing human motion data. The objective of this study was to use PCA to quantify the biggest variance in knee kinematics waveforms between a Non-Pathological (NP) group and individuals awaiting High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) surgery.

Methods

Thirty knees (29 participants) who were scheduled for HTO surgery were included in this study. Twenty-eight NP volunteers were recruited into the study. Human motion analysis was performed during level gait using a modified Cleveland marker set. Subjects walked at their self-selected speed for a minimum of 6 successful trials. Knee kinematics were calculated within Visual3D (C-Motion). The first three Principal Components (PCs) of each input variable were selected. Single-component reconstruction was performed alongside representative extremes of each PC to aid interpretation of the biomechanical feature reconstructed by each component.

Results

Pre-operatively patient demographics included (age: 50.70 (8.71) years; height: 1.75 (.11) m; body mass: 90.57 (20.17) kg; mTFA: 7.75 (3.72) degrees varus; gait speed: 1.06 (0.23) m/s). The HTO cohort was significantly older and had a higher mass than the NP control participants. For knee kinematics the first three PCs explained 88%, 95% and 89% of the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes, respectively. The main variances can be explained by sagittal plane magnitude differences, peak swing is associated with toe-off, a reduced knee flexion angle is associated with a longer time spent in stance, pre-HTO remain adducted during stance and pre-HTO patients remain more externally rotated during stance and latter part of swing.

Conclusions

This study has introduced PCA in trying to better understand the biomechanical differences between a control group and a cohort with medial knee osteoarthritis varus deformity awaiting HTO. Further analysis will be undertaken using PCA comparing pre- and post-surgery which will be of importance in clinical decision making.