Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Musculoskeletal injuries are the leading contributor to disability globally, yet current treatments do not offer complete restoration of the tissue. This has resulted in the exploration of novel interventions based on tissue engineering as a therapeutic solution. This study aimed to explore novel collagen sponges as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering as an initial step in the construction of tendon-bone co-culture constructs in vitro.
Methods
Collagen sponges (Jellagen, UK), manufactured from Jellyfish collagen were seeded with 10,000 rat osteoblast cells (dROBs) and maintained in culture for 6 days (37°C, 5% CO2). Qualitative viability was assessed by a fluorescent Calcein-AM live cell stain and quantitively via the CYQUANT cell viability assay (Invitrogen, UK) on days 0, 1, 4 and 6 in culture (n=3 per time point). Digital imaging was also used to assess size and shape changes to the collagen sponge in culture.
Results
The collagen sponge biomaterial supported dROB adhesion, viability and proliferation with an abundance of viable cells detected by fluorescent microscopy on day 6. Indeed, the quantitative assessment confirmed that cellular proliferation was evident with increases in fluorescence detected from 517 (± 88) RFU to 8730 ± (2228) RFU from day 0 to 6. In addition, the size of the collagen sponges appeared to decrease over time, indicating contraction of the collagen sponges in culture.
Conclusions
This preliminary study has demonstrated that the novel collagen sponges support cellular attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts, and is an important first step in building a bone-tendon construct in vitro. Our future work is focussed on using the osteoblast-seeded sponges in combination with tendon cells, to build a co-culture to represent the bone-tendon interface in vitro. This work has the potential to advance the clinical translation of tissue-engineered tendons to the clinic.
Declaration of Interest
(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.
