Abstract
3D printing acetabular cups offers the theoretical advantage of enhanced bony fixation due to greater design control of the porous implant surfaces. Analysing retrieved 3D printed implants can help determine whether this design intent has been achieved.
We sectioned 14 off-the-shelf retrieved acetabular cups for histological analysis; 7 cups had been 3D printed and 7 had been conventionally manufactured. Some of the most commonly used contemporary designs were represented in both groups, which were removed due to either aseptic loosening, unexplained pain, infection or dislocation. Clinical data was collected for all implants, including their age, gender, and time to revision.
Bone ingrowth was evaluated using microscopic assessment and two primary outcome measures: 1) bone area fraction and 2) extent of bone ingrowth.
The additively manufactured cups were revised after a median (IQR) time of 24.9 months (20.5 to 45.6) from patients with a median (IQR) age of 61.1 years (48.4 to 71.9), while the conventional cups had a median (IQR) time to revision of 46.3 months (34.7 to 49.1, p = 0.366) and had been retrieved from patients with a median age of 66.0 years (56.9 to 68.9, p = 0.999).
The additively and conventionally manufactured implants had a median (IQR) bone area fraction of 65.7% (36.4 to 90.6) and 33.9% (21.9 to 50.0), respectively (p < 0.001).
A significantly greater amount of bone ingrowth was measured into the backside of the additively manufactured acetabular cups, compared to their conventional counterparts (p < 0.001). Bone occupied a median of 60.0% and 5.7% of the porous depth in the additively manufactured and conventional cups, respectively.
3D printed components were found to achieve a greater amount of bone ingrowth than their conventionally manufactured counterparts, suggesting that the complex porous structures generated through this manufacturing technique may encourage greater osteointegration.
