Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The effectiveness of single intra-articular injections of polyacrylamide hydrogel (iPAAG) and hyaluronic acid (HA) was compared in subgroups of participants from an RCT based on baseline age, BMI or Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade.
Methodology
239 participants were randomised to 6 mL iPAAG (Arthrosamid; n=119) or 6 mL HA (Synvisc-One; n=120). Participants continued analgesics (except 48 hours prior to visits) and non-pharmacological therapy. Topical therapies and intra-articular corticosteroids were not allowed. Pre-specified subgroup analyses (age: <70 years, ≥70 years; BMI: normal, overweight, obese; KL grade: 2, 3, 4, 2–3) of change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale at 52 weeks were based on the least squares means for the treatment-by-week interaction effect using a mixed model for repeated measurement with a restricted maximum likelihood-based approach.
Results
Across all patients, change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale in the iPAAG group was non-inferior to HA at 26 weeks and approached superiority (p=0.0572) at 52 weeks. Treatment differences for change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale in favour of iPAAG over HA were statistically significant for the age <70 years (p=0.019), BMI normal (p=0.011) and KL grade 2–3 (p=0.033) subgroups. Treatment differences for all other subgroups favoured iPAAG, except for KL grade 4 which favoured HA, without reaching statistical significance.
Conclusion
iPAAG approached superiority to HA across all participants at 52weeks, but demonstrated statistical superiority in participants with normal BMI, participants <70 years old or participants with KL score 2–3. iPAAG represents a useful alternative to HA for the treatment of knee OA.
