Abstract
Aim
To evaluate the bacterial counts of sonicatied implants in patients with osteoarticular infections. Various studies have demostrated the usefulness of sonication of retrieved implants in order to provide an accurate microbiological diagnosis. Although cutoff values for original sonicate counts have been established, the use of centrifugation may influence these values
Method
A retrospective, single-center study, including sonication fluid samples from implants removed between January 2011 and October 2023, was performed. Patients were diagnosed with implant-associated infection based on the criteria available at the time of diagnosis. Osteoarticular implants were sonicated following the protocol described by Esteban et al. Sonicated fluid was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 3000 x g, and the sediment was resuspended in 5 mL of phosphate buffer solution. Ten µl of the sample were streaked onto each medium for quantitative culture. Bacterial counts exceeding 100,000 CFU/mL were considered as 100,000 CFU/mL for statistical analysis.
Results
The study included 457 sonication fluid samples. Of these, 316 samples were from patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI), with 26.3 % diagnosed with acute PJI and 73.7 % with chronic PJI. Additionally, 141 samples were from patients with osteosynthesis infection. The median CFU/ml in the sonication fluid was 40,000 CFU/mL (IQR 1,000 CFU/mL-100,000 CFU/mL). No statistically significant difference was observed between the different types of implants (prosthesis vs. osteosynthesis, p=0.218). A trend of higher counts was noted for acute PJI compared to chronic PJI (р=0.052). Most infections were monomicrobial, but 16.2% were polymicrobial. Statistically significant higher bacterial counts were observed in polymicrobial infections compared to monomicrobial infections (р<0.005). Among monomicrobial infections, no differences were found between Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms (р=0.416). No differences were also found between joints (knee vs. hip) (p=0.353).
Conclusions
Significant variability was observed in the number of colonies detected in all samples, regardless of the type of implant, the number of microorganisms or the species identified. Higher counts were detected in polymicrobial infections, and a trend was also noted for higher counts in acute infections.
