Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

ANTERIOR OR POSTERIOR SURGERY FOR RIGHT THORACIC ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS (AIS)? RADIOLOGIC & FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES∗

Britspine, British Scoliosis Society (BSS), Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR), British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS)



Abstract

Comparison of clinical, radiological & functional outcomes of corrective surgery for right thoracic AIS curves.

There is a paucity of data relating functional outcomes to the radiological and surface measurement results of either posterior or anterior surgery for right thoracic AIS.

Prospective, cohort study, mean follow up 35 months (range 9-115)

38 patients (6 males); 22 Lenke 2 posterior, 16 Lenke 1 anterior.

Primary= rib hump, radiological (frontal Cobb correction, apical vertebral translation AVT, sagittal profile), Modified SRS Outcomes Instrument (MSRSI). Secondary= estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, complications

No significant difference at P<0.005 with student t-test unless indicated

Rib Hump: 16° posterior 17 ° anterior, corrected to 8 ° (50%) and 6 ° (60%) respectively.

Thoracic Cobb: 70° posterior 61 ° anterior, corrected to 27° (61%) and 22° (64%) respectively. No difference in preoperative curve flexibility or fulcrum bending correction index. Thoracic AVT 55% correction posterior, 70% anterior, Lumbar Cobb 59% correction posterior, 52% anterior. Thoracic kyphosis significantly reduced in posterior surgery (35 ° to 20 °) and significantly increased with anterior surgery (21° to 30°). Lumbar lordosis significantly reduced with posterior surgery (88° to 47°), no significant change with anterior surgery (60° to 53°).

MSRSI; Domain scores similar preoperatively between groups. Difference scores (postop-preop), higher scores=better. Pain: +1.21 posterior +0.73 anterior. Self image: +1.02 posterior +0.71 anterior. Function/activity: +0.28 posterior +0.21 anterior. Mental health: +0.66 posterior +0.45 anterior.

No significant difference in complication rate, operative time or estimated blood loss

Similar cohorts of AIS patients treated by either anterior or posterior surgery have no significant differences in radiological or functional outcomes. The different final sagittal profile in both groups did not affect the MSRSI outcomes. Both procedures deliver significant health gains as measured by the MSRSI.