Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Oncology

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR LOCAL RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS: A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 2445 PATIENTS TREATED FOR STS

The European Musculo-Skeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS)



Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the results of a series of cases from a single institution with respect to local disease control and patient survival to determine prognostic factors.

Methods

Electronic patient records were reviewed on all patients with STS between February 1963 and January 2007. 2445 patients had over 30 types of STS. 1639 (67%) had not received any treatment prior to presentation, however, 770 patients (32%) had undergone a previous attempted excision. Survival analyses were done using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses, however, for prognostic factor analysis, only patients presenting without prior treatment were included.

Results

Common diagnoses were liposarcoma (292 patients, 12%), synovial sarcoma (242 patients, 10%) and leiomyosarcoma (239 patients, 10%). Most presented in the thigh (950 patients, 39%), arm (325 patients, 13%) or lower leg (275 patients, 11%) and most were deep to fascia (1581 patients, 74%). The mean size was 10.2cm. Overall cumulative patient survival was 58% at 5 years and 44% at 10 years. Locally recurrent disease occurred in 350 patients (14%), 204 patients (8%) presented with and 720 patients (30%) subsequently developed metastatic disease. Prognostic factors for locally recurrent disease were arm tumours (p=0.003, HR=0.3), hip tumours (p=0.01, HR=0.31), thigh tumours (p=0.002, HR=0.52), intralesional margins (p<0.0001, HR=3.7), high grade tumours (p=0.03, HR=1.8), tumour size 3-6cm (p=0.04, HR=0.54) and tumour size 6-10cm (p=0.03, HR=0.63). Prognostic factors for patient survival were deep location (p=0.02, HR=1.6), high grade tumours (p<0.0001, HR=4.7), intermediate grade tumours (p<0.0001, HR=3.4), surgical margins (p=0.04), age at diagnosis (p<0.0001, HR=1.02), size of tumour <3cms (p=0.04, HR=0.29), 3-6cms (p<0.0001, HR=0.41), 6-10cms (p=0.007, HR=0.63), no locally recurrent disease (p=0.0001, HR=0.59).

Conclusions

Significant prognostic factors have been proven for STS, and marginal margins have not been proven to alter the risk of locally recurrent disease or patient survival.