Abstract
Bioabsorbable screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been shown to be associated with femoral tunnel widening and cyst formation.
To compare a poly-L-lactide–hydroxyapatite screw (PLLA-HA) with a titanium screw with respect to clinical and radiological outcomes over a 5 year period.
40 patients were equally randomized into 2 groups (PLLA-HA vs titanium) and ACLR performed with a 4 strand hamstring graft with femoral tunnel drilling via the anteromedial portal. Evaluation at 2 and 5 years was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee assessment (IKDC), Lysholm knee score, KT 1000 arthrometer, single-legged hop test. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate tunnel and screw volume, ossification around the screws, graft integration and cyst formation.
There was no difference in any clinical outcome measure at 2 or 5 years between the 2 groups. At 2 years, the PLLA-HA femoral tunnel was significantly smaller than the titanium screw tunnel (p=0.015) and at 5 years, there was no difference. At 2 years the femoral PLLA-HA screw was a mean 76% of its original volume and by 5 years, 36%. At 2 years the tibial PLLA-HA screw mean volume was 68% of its original volume and by 5 years, 46%. At 5 years, 88% of femoral tunnels and 56% of tibial tunnels demonstrated a significant ossification response. There was no increase in cyst formation in the PLLA-HA group and no screw breakages.
The PLLA-HA screw provides adequate aperture fixation in ACLR with excellent functional outcomes. It was not associated with femoral tunnel widening or increased cyst formation when compared with the titanium screw. The resorbtion characteristics appear favourable and the hydroxyapatite component of the screw may stimulate osteoconduction, contributing to these results. The PLLA-HA screw is a good alternative to a titanium screw in ACLR, which may aid revision procedures and allow for imaging without artifact.
