Abstract
Military patients have high functional requirements of the upper limb and may have lower pre-operative PROM scores than civilian patients i.e. their function is high when benchmarked, but still insufficient to perform their military role thereby mandating surgery.
Our aim was to compare the pre-operative Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores in military and civilian patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery.
We undertook a prospective, blinded cohort-controlled study (OCEBM Level 3b). The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores between military and civilian groups. A power calculation showed that 40 patients were required in each group to give 95% power with 5% significance. A clinical database (iParrot, ByResults Ltd., Oxford, UK) was interrogated for consecutive patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery at a single centre. The senior author - blinded to the outcome score - matched patients according to age, gender and diagnosis. Statistical analysis showed the data to be normally distributed so a paired samples t-test was used to compare the two groups.
110 patients were required to provide a matched cohort of 80 patients. There were 70 males and 10 females. Age at the time of surgery was 16–19 yrs (n=6); 20–24yrs (n=28); 25–29 (n=16); 30–34 (n=12); 35–39 (n=12); 40–44 (n=6). 72 patients (90%) had polar group one and 8 patients (10%) had polar group two instability. The mean Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in the civilian group was 17 and the in military group was 18. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (p=0.395).
This study supports the use the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score to assess military patients with shoulder instability.
