Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

VALIDATION OF A CT BASED CLASSIFICATION OF LUMBOSACRAL SEGMENT ABNORMALITIES

Combined British Scoliosis Society/Nordic Spinal Deformity Society (BSS/NSDS)



Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study is to describe and validate a CT based classification of lumbosacral segment abnormalities.

Method

400 CT scans were retrospectively reviewed, a classification devised and incidence of abnormalities recorded. 5 types of abnormality were identified. Type 0 is normal; Type 1 describes an asymmetrical shortening of the iliolumbar ligament; Type 2's have the transverse process of L5 within 2 mm of the sacrum but not forming a joint; Type 3's have formed a diarthrodial joint, with 3A's showing no evidence of degeneration and 3B's displaying degenerative changes; In type 4's the transverse process and sacrum have fused; Type5's have involvement of L4. In order to validate the classification, 40 scans were selected with a full cross section of types. 4 independent observers classified each scan in 2 separate sessions, 2 weeks apart.

Results

In the study population there was an abnormality in 54.5% of individuals. In order to validate the classification the intra-observer and inter-observer ratings were analysed. The kappa values for the intra-observer results were between 0.69 and 0.88, indicating substantial agreement (using the Landis and Koch kappa interpretation). The results for inter-observer ratings also gave a combined score of over 0.7 for both sessions, again indicating substantial agreement.

Conclusion

A CT classification of lumbosacral segment abnormalities, which is both straight forward to use and repeatable, has been produced. The incidence of these abnormalities is higher in our population of CT scans compared to previous published series using plain radiographs.



Ethics approval Audit/service standard in trust

Interest Statement: None