Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

MICRO TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF FUSION AND MICROARCHITECTURE IN A POSTEROLATERAL SPINAL FUSION SHEEP MODEL USING A SYNTHETIC OSTEOINDUCTIVE CARBONATED HYDROXYAPATITE SCAFFOLD ACTIVATED WITH STEM CELLS IN A BIOREACTOR

Combined British Scoliosis Society/Nordic Spinal Deformity Society (BSS/NSDS)



Abstract

Background

For bone grafting procedures, the use of autologous bone is considered the gold standard, as it is has a better healing capacity compared to other alternatives as allograft and synthetic bone substitutes. However, as there are several drawbacks related to autografting (infection, nerve- or vascular damage, chronic pain problems, abdominal herniation), there has been a targeted effort to improve the healing capacities of synthetic bone substitutes.

Aim

To evaluate the performance of a carbonated osteoionductive hydroxyapatite (CHA) scaffold of clinical relevant size (Ø=15mm, H=50mm) in a sheep model of multi level posterolateral intertransverse lumbar spine fusion after activation with autologous bone marrow nuclear cells (BMNC) in a flow perfusion bioreactor.

Method

Two groups were included in the study, autograft (n=6) and CHA scaffold (n=6) CHA. A paired design was used between and within the groups as lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis was performed in sheep on two levels (L2-L3, L5-L6) +/− BMNC, respectively. Before implantation, the CHA scaffold was cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor system with BMNC for 21 days, and the autograft group was supplemented with isolated BMNC during the procedure. Micro tomography was used to evaluate fusion rate and the microarchitectural properties of the explants after an observation period of four months.

Results

In the autograft group, the healing rate was 83.3% irrespective of the presence BMNC, and in the CHA group, 66.7% fused in the presence of BMNC, and 33.3% without. The microarchitectural data suggested the autograft group to be superior to the CHA scaffold regarding mechanical properties, however porosity decreased significantly (p=0.001) in the CHA scaffold group suggesting deposition of mineralized bone matrix.

Conclusion

Based on the fusion rate and micro architectural properties, we consider the CHA scaffold fully capable of new bone formation, and that the presence of BMNC has a positive effect on the fusion rate in a challenging model of bone healing.