Abstract
Purpose
to evaluate the radial displacement of meniscal allograft transplants (MATs) in patients operated with an open technique vs. an arthroscopic technique at 1 year postoperatively. Radial displacement or extrusion of the graft is frequently observed after meniscus transplantation. The hypothesis is that arthroscopically inserted MATs extrude less than open MATs and therefore have a more intra-articular position than open surgery transplants.
Materials and Methods
39 patients were included in the study: the first group of open surgery transplants consisted of 16 patients (10 lateral, 6 medial). The second group of arthroscopic transplants consisted of 21 patients (14 lateral, 7 medial). MR-images were taken one year post-surgery. The displacement, evaluated on 1,5T MR coronal images, was defined as the distance between the tibial plateau and the outer edge of the meniscus.
Results
The radial displacement of lateral open surgery transplants (mean = 4,04 mm; SD = 1,46) is significantly larger (p < 0,05) than the displacement of arthroscopically implanted MATs (mean = 3,38 mm; SD = 0,85). The external displacement of medial open surgery transplants (mean = 4,71 mm; SD = 0,97) is significantly larger (p < 0,05) than the displacement of arthroscopically implanted MATs (mean = 2,36 mm; SD = 0,89).
Conclusion
Graft position is influenced by the surgical technique; the radial displacement of arthroscopically implanted MATs is, both lateral and medial, significantly less than meniscal transplants implanted by open surgery. The clinical relevance remains to be determined.
