Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

MODIFIED VALGUS OSTEOTOMY OF PROXIMAL FEMUR FOR TREATMENT OF FEMORAL NECK NONUNION

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Background

Femoral neck nonunion is a challenging problem. If it is not treated properly, it will be ended with a catastrophe because the victims are younger and active patients and missing hip joint will result in a handicapped like person. If the head is viable, the best treatment is valgus osteotomy. In the original technique, site of nonunion was not explored but in our technique, there is exploration and cleaning of nonunion site and after reduction of fragments, fixation and subtrochanteric osteotomy were done.

Materials and methods

Patients with established nonunion of femoral neck fracture entered in study. Inclusion criteria's were age under 60 years old, spherical head of femur without changing the density of it and femoral neck nonunion at least 6 months after fracture. Nonunion site was freshed and any hard ware was removed and head was reduced as possible and subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy to 150 degree was done and fixed with angle blade plate. Bone graft was not used. Patients were studied one year monthly for signs of union of fracture site and signs of avascular necrosis of femoral head.

Results

29 patients were entered in study. 21 male and 8 female with the mean age of 33 years(18 to 55). 19 had Garden type 4 and 7 garden type 3 and the rest 3 had garden type2 at first. Fracture of fixation device were seen in 15 patients. After average 4 months (3 to 5.5) 27 of them showed union of fracture site but in 7 cases, because of some collapse in fracture site, tip of hard ware entered the joint and in 2 cases avascular necrosis of head appeared.

Discussion

Exploration of nonunion has some advantages. At first, in some cases removing of broken implants would be necessary for proper insertion of new device. Second, better reduction of fracture site may improve fixation and biomechanics. Third, it seems that in these cases there were through union but in the original method, there were metaplasia of fibrous tissue in the fracture site nonunion.