Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

DYNAMIC WEIGHT BEARING VIEWS OF THE PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT DISCRIPTION AND VALIDATION OF A NEW TECHINIQUE

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

The patella is a complex sesamoid bone within the quadriceps enhancing mechanical advantage of the extensor mechanism. Depending on activity, the patella magnifies either force or displacement; behaving as a lever, by redirecting quadriceps force it also acts as a pulley.

Aim

We describe and validate a device for obtaining consistent dynamic weight bearing views of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ).

Materials and Methods

Weight bearing (WB) axial views of 48 knees (24 patients) were performed using the device. The sulcus angle (SA), congruence angle (CA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), facet angle (FA) and patellofemoral displacement (PD) were measured. These were compared with similar measurements made on prone (PR) and axial (AX) radiographs of same knees.

Results

Variance (V=SD2) and Standard error of mean (SEM/95% CI) for all measurements in each of the three views were analysed. For the Sulcus Angle, Congruence angle and LPFA, the WB view had the lowest SEM and the least variance in comparison to PR and AX views (SEM 1.05/V 30.14, SEM 2.52/V 172.39 and SEM 1.34/V 47.61 respectively for the SA, SEM 3.09/V 256, SEM 2.79/V 210.25 and SEM 3.37/V 306.25 respectively for the CA, SEM 0.67/V 11.9, SEM 1.20/V39.06 and SEM 1.03/V 28.83 respectively for the LPFA). SEM and Variance for FA measurements were similar for WB and AX views but superior to PR views (SEM 1.62/V 70.56, SEM 1.6/V 68.9 and SEM 2.3/V 148.84 respectively). Mean PFD was maximum on the WB view compared to the PR and AX views (36.0, −45.62 and 22.23 respectively) with lowest SEM and V (SEM 8.73/V 2052.0, SEM 18.65/V 92959.67 and SEM 9.70/V 2540.16 respectively).

Conclusion

The WB view as introduced and reported here has consistently lower Variance, SEM and SD in comparison to Axial and Prone views for all measurements of the PFJ. WB view also gives a more accurate dynamic measure of Patello Femoral displacement. The view is easily obtained and readily reproduced.