Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

CLINICAL THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS AFTER ACUTE ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE MANAGEMENT: NON WEIGHT BEARING IN PLASTER CAST VERSUS FUNCTIONAL WEIGHT BEARING MOBILISATION

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Introduction/Aim

Thromboembolism is a significant cause of patient morbidity and mortality, the risk of which increases in orthopaedic patients with lower limb immobilisation. It was therefore, our aim to identify a difference in symptomatic thromboembolism by treating acute Achilles tendon rupture patients with conventional non-weight bearing plaster versus functional weight bearing mobilisation.

Methodology

The notes of 91 consecutive patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were reviewed. The patients demographics, treatment modality (non-weight bearing plaster versus weight bearing boot), and predisposing risk factors were analysed. From the 91 patients, 50 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated conservatively in a non-weight bearing immobilisation cast. From these 50 patients, 3 then underwent surgery and were therefore excluded from the results. 41 patients were treated with functional weight bearing mobilisation. Patients who did have a symptomatic thromboembolic event had an ultrasound scan to confirm a deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb, or a CT-scan to confirm pulmonary embolism.

Results

Out of the 47 patients who were treated conservatively in a non-weight bearing plaster cast, 9 patients (19.1 %) had a thromboembolic event. Out of the 41 patients who were treated with functional weight bearing mobilisation, 2 patients (4.8%) had a thromboembolic event. Thus, patients who were treated in a non-weight bearing plaster had a significantly higher risk of developing thromboembolism (p value of <0.05) and an increased risk ratio of 24% compared to those who were treated with functional weight bearing mobilisation.

Conclusion

There is a significant decrease in the clinical incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated conservatively with early mobilisation in the functional weight bearing boot compared to those treated in a non-weight bearing cast.