Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

OPINIONS CONCERNING WHIPLASH INJURIES

Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) Annual Meeting



Abstract

Aims

To capture the views of various members of the healthcare system with regards to whiplash injuries and in particular, the cumulative effects of whiplash on a patient seeking compensation.

Method

A questionnaire was set up on “Surveymonkey” which consisted of three scenarios outlining 1. single whiplash injury 2. Past history of neck pain with new whiplash injury 3. Chronic history of neck pain with a new whiplash injury seeking long term compensation and early retirement. The respondents were asked whether or not they agreed or disagreed with fictional expert opinions for each scenario. The questionnaire was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons, accident & emergency doctors, general practitioners and physiotherapists.

Results

In Scenario 1, half of the respondents believed that after a single whiplash injury with no past history of neck pain a decision of 3 months worth of disability compensation was acceptable. In Scenario 2, 67% of respondents opined that a previous history of whiplash injury makes a patient more susceptible to further soft tissue damage. Finally, in Scenario 3 100% of respondents believe that a decision of 12 years of compensation and early retirement due to his new injury was unjustifiable.

Conclusions

Our questionnaire revealed that the majority of respondents believe that whiplash injuries are cumulative in nature. They also are of the opinion that chronic neck pain, once settled, does not contribute to subsequent whiplash injury.

Conflicts of Interest

None

Source of Funding

None