Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

INTERFRAGMENTARY COMPRESSION OF DIFFERENT TIBIA PLATEAU SPLIT FRACTURE FIXATION TECHNIQUES: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

8th Combined Meeting Of Orthopaedic Research Societies (CORS)



Abstract

Summary Statement

Tibia plateau split fracture fixation with two cancellous screws is particularly suitable for non-osteoporotic bone, whereas four cortical lag screws provide a comparable compression in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic bone. Angle-stable locking plates maintain the preliminary compression applied by a reduction clamp.

Introduction

Interfragmentary compression in tibia plateau split fracture fixation is necessary to maintain anatomical reduction and avoid post-traumatic widening of the plateau. However, its amount depends on the applied fixation technique. The aim of the current study was to quantify the interfragmentary compression generated by a reduction clamp with subsequent angle-stable locking plate fixation in an osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic synthetic human bone model in comparison to cancellous or cortical lag screw fixation.

Methods

Adult synthetic human tibiae with hard or soft cancellous bone were osteotomised at the lateral tibia plateau creating a split fracture (AO type 41-B1) and fixed with either two 6.5 mm cancellous, four 3.5 mm cortical lag screws or 3.5 mm LCP proximal lateral tibia plate, preliminary compressed by a reduction clamp (n = 5 per group). Interfragmentary compression was measured by a pressure sensor film after instrumentation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc correction was performed for statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

Results

Applying a reduction clamp, interfragmentary compression was 0.6 MPa ± 0.1 in non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic bone. The locking plate was able to maintain the compression (0.5 MPa ± 0.1) in non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic bone, but it was significantly lower compared to four cortical lag screws (non-osteoporotic p = 0.01; osteoporotic p = 0.03). Comparing four 3.5 mm cortical lag screws, compression was not significantly different between the non-osteoporotic (1.7 MPa ± 0.7) and osteoporotic bone (1.4 MPa ± 0.5). Two 6.5 mm cancellous lag screws achieved significantly higher compression in non-osteoporotic (2.1 MPa ± 0.6) compared to osteoporotic (0.8 MPa ± 0.2, p = 0.01) bone.

Conclusion

Preliminary compression applied by a reduction clamp was maintained by angle-stable locking plates. The two 6.5 mm cancellous screw technique would especially be appropriate for young human non-osteoporotic bone, whereas the four 3.5 mm cortical screw configuration could also be applied in osteoporotic bone.