Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Hip

A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF ACETABULAR COMPONENT INSERTION METHOD ON OPERATIVE ACETABULAR INCLINATION DURING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

The British Hip Society (BHS)



Abstract

Introduction

Operative inclination (OI) is defined as the angle between the acetabular axis and the sagittal plane. With the patient in the true lateral decubitus position, this corresponds to the angle formed between the handle of the acetabular component inserter and the theatre floor intra-operatively.

Patients/Materials & Methods

The primary study aim was to determine which method of acetabular component insertion most accurately allows the surgeon to obtain a target OI of 35o.

270 consecutive patients undergoing cementless THA were randomised to one of three possible methods for acetabular component implantation:

1. Freehand,

2. 35o mechanical alignment guide (MAG), or

3. Digital inclinometer assisted

Two surgeons participated. Target OI was 35o in all cases. OI was measured using a digital inclinometer. For the freehand and MAG cases, the surgeon was blinded to inclinometer readings intra-operatively.

Results

Freehand: OI 25.2 – 43.2o. Mean deviation from target 2.92o.

35o MAG: OI 29.3 – 39.3o. Mean deviation from target 1.83o.

Inclinometer assisted: OI 27.5 – 37.5o. Mean deviation from target 1.28o.

Overall, when comparing mean deviation from target OI, a statistically significant difference between both the Freehand/Inclinometer group and Freehand/MAG group was demonstrated (p<0.001). A statistically significant difference between the Inclinometer/MAG groups was also demonstrated (p<0.023).

Discussion

Both the 35o MAG and digital inclinometer assisted methods provided a considerably narrower OI range when compared to the freehand method. Though the range was similar for both the 35o MAG and digital inclinometer assisted methods, the SD was smaller in the inclinometer assisted group.

Conclusion

The novel method of using a digital inclinometer to control operative inclination appears to be more accurate than both the freehand and mechanical alignment guide methods and may help further optimise acetabular component orientation.