Introduction. Arthroscopic ankle fusion is an effective treatment for end stage ankle arthritis. It reliably improves pain but at the expense of ankle motion. Development of adjacent degenerative joint disease in the foot is thought to be a consequence of ankle fusion due to altered biomechanics. However, it has been reported to be present on pre-operative radiographs in many patients. There is very little evidence reporting the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic ankle fusion and particularly those requiring secondary procedures for adjacent joint disease. Material and methods. We reviewed the operative records of 149 patients who had undergone arthroscopic ankle fusion under the care of two consultant foot and ankle surgeons between 2002 and 2006. We contacted patients by telephone to determine whether they had required further investigation or surgery on the same foot after their index procedure. Secondary outcome measures included a Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOQFQ) score and a patient satisfaction score. Results. 149 patients underwent 151 arthroscopic ankle fusions. Nine had died or developed dementia and 30 patients had incomplete hospital records leaving 111 available for follow-up with a response rate of 55% (65 ankles). The average time to follow-up was 12.0 years (9.5–16.6 years). 14 patients (22%) had undergone a secondary procedure including injections on the foot or ankle of the same side as the index procedure. Four of these procedures were arthrodeses and three of these were of the subtalar joint. Mean MOQFQ score was 18.0 (0–55). Overall 83% (54) patients were very satisfied or satisfied with their ankle fusion. Conclusions. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis results in high patient satisfaction rates at long-term follow-up. The number of patients requiring a secondary procedure due to ongoing pain and adjacent degenerative joint disease in their foot following ankle arthrodesis is low

Aims. Revision rates for ankle arthroplasties are higher than hip or knee arthroplasties. When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can either undergo revision to another ankle replacement, revision of the TAA to ankle arthrodesis (fusion), or amputation. Currently there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of these revisions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of revision TAA with respect to surgery type, functional outcomes, and reoperations. Methods. A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant papers. Papers analyzing surgical treatment for failed ankle arthroplasties were included. All papers were reviewed by two authors. Overall, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed. Results. Six papers analyzed all-cause reoperations of revision ankle arthroplasties, and 14 papers analyzed failures of conversion of a TAA to fusion. It was found that 26.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.4% to 40.1%) of revision ankle arthroplasties required further surgical intervention and 13.0% (95% CI 4.9% to 23.4%) of conversion to fusions; 14.4% (95% CI 8.4% to 21.4%) of revision ankle arthroplasties failed and 8% (95% CI 4% to 13%) of conversion to fusions failed. Conclusion. Revision of primary TAA can be an effective procedure with improved functional outcomes, but has considerable risks of failure and reoperation, especially in those with periprosthetic joint infection. In those who undergo conversion of TAA to fusion, there are high rates of nonunion. Further comparative studies are required to compare both operative techniques. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):596–606

Aims

A multicentre, randomized, clinician-led, pragmatic, parallel-group orthopaedic trial of two surgical procedures was set up to obtain high-quality evidence of effectiveness. However, the trial faced recruitment challenges and struggled to maintain recruitment rates over 30%, although this is not unusual for surgical trials. We conducted a qualitative study with the aim of gathering information about recruitment practices to identify barriers to patient consent and participation to an orthopaedic trial.

Aim. Failed consolidation (nonunion) after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a major complication, which can lead to additional revision arthrodesis with increased risk of morbidity. Multiple factors can contribute to developing a nonunion, including a low-grade infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of unsuspected low-grade infection in revision arthrodesis for nonunions after foot and ankle arthrodesis. We also analyzed the outcome of unsuspected low-grade infections. Method. We conducted a retrospective study in The Sint Maartenskliniek, The Netherlands. All patients who underwent revision arthrodesis for assumed aseptic nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis between January 2020 and July 2021 were included. Patients were excluded if <5 tissue samples were obtained during revision arthrodesis or if they were treated for infection after the index arthrodesis. For the included patients, at least 5 tissue samples for culture were taken during the revision arthrodesis. The causative microorganisms, antibiotic susceptibility and treatment were assessed. An unsuspected infection was defined as ≥2 positive cultures with phenotypical identical microorganisms. Success was defined as union on imaging during clinical follow-up, without signs of persistent infection after finishing the antibiotic treatment. Results. In total 91 revision arthrodesis due to nonunion were performed. The mean duration between index and revision arthrodesis was 571 days. In 14 patients, an unexpected infection was diagnosed. The most frequent causative bacteria identified were Cutibacterium acnes (n=10) and Staphylococcus spps. (n=5). One infection was caused by a Gram-negative bacilli (Acinetobacter spps.). Two infections were polymicrobial. Of the 14 infections, 12 were treated with antibiotics for 12 weeks, 1 for 6 weeks and 1 was not treated. After one-year follow-up, the success rate was 86% and in one patient re-surgery was performed for a non-infectious reason. Conclusions. In 18% of the revisions for nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis, an unexpected low- grade infection was the cause of the nonunion. Nonunion occurring after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a severe complication, leading to additional revision arthrodesis. Low-grade infection should be considered as possible explanation of the nonunion, despite the lack of local inflammatory signs. As 18% of the nonunions were unexpectedly caused by low-grade infection, we strongly recommend obtaining at least 5 tissue samples for culture during revision arthrodesis. The outcome of unexpected infection as cause of nonunion is good, when treated with targeted antibiotics for 12 weeks

Ankle arthrodesis and replacement are the widely accepted options in managing end-stage ankle arthritis. Ankle replacement as an alternate treatment option for ankle arthritis is relatively new and this is in large part to the successes observed with hip and knee arthroplasty for arthritis. Relative benefits of ankle replacement and arthrodesis remains a contentious topic. We conducted a multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial, first of its kind, comparing the clinical outcomes of ankle arthrodesis and ankle replacement in managing ankle arthritis. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes would be similar for both. Patients recruited for this study were part of Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Database. Canadian orthopaedic surgeons with fellowship training in foot and ankle surgery or extensive experience in the surgical treatment of end stage ankle arthritis determined whether the patient met the criteria for randomization, skeletal maturity, symptomatic ankle arthritis no longer amenable to non-operative management, and ability to give informed consent. Data was collected on patient demographics, follow-up time period, complication rates, and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores. Our analysis of clinical outcomes was divided into two parts: (1) comparison of pre and postoperative data for each cohort separately, and (2) comparison of outcome scores, and revision rates between both cohorts. We employed the Student's t-test and calculated effect sizes in assessing improvements in AOS and SF-36 scores from baseline to latest follow-up within and between the two groups. We also examined postoperative complication and reoperation rates in the study population using the standardized coding system for reoperations following ankle replacement and arthrodesis. Thirty-nine ankles were enrolled in the study with a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.8 years. Ankle osteoarthritis scale scores improved significantly from baseline and last follow-up in both groups. The average baseline AOS total score for ankle replacement improved from 59.4 ±15.9 to 38 ±20 at last follow-up (p-value 19.7 to 31.8 ±16.5 at last follow-up (p-value 25.4 compared to ankle replacement's 20.3 ±23. Two major complications (10.5%) were observed in the ankle replacement cohort while the ankle arthrodesis cohort saw four major complications (20%). Clinical outcomes of ankle replacement and arthrodesis were comparable. The ankle arthrodesis cohort held a slight advantage over ankle replacement in improvement of AOS scores, though not statistically significant. Rates of major complications and reoperations were higher with ankle arthrodesis

Autologous bone has been the gold standard for grafting material in foot and ankle arthrodesis. While autograft use has been effective, the harvest procedure does present risks to the patient including readmission, infection, and persistent graft harvest site pain. Previous studies have examined graft harvest site pain, but most have focused on the iliac crest and none have long term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term (7–10 year) harvest site pain in subjects undergoing autograft harvest from multiple sites for hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Sixty (60) subjects underwent hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis supplemented with autograft as part of the control arm of a prospective, randomized trial. The mean subject age was 59.4 years (range, 24.7–76.8) and mean body mass index was 30.6 kg/m2 (range, 22.0–44.0). There were 29 males and 31 female subjects. Subjects had the tibiotalar (37.9%), subtalar (24.1%), talonavicular (10.3%), subtalar/talonavicular (5.1%), or subtalar/calcaneocuboid/talonavicular (22.4%) joints arthrodesed. Autograft was harvested from either the proximal tibia (51.7%), iliac crest (17.2%), calcaneous (15.5%), distal tibia (6.8%), or other location (8.6%). Graft harvest site pain was evaluated using a 100-point visual analog score (VAS), with clinically significant pain being any score greater than 20. Subjects were followed a mean of 9.0 years (range, 7.8–10.5). The percentage of subjects who reported clinically significant pain was 35.7%, 21.4%, 18.2%, 10.5%, 8.9%, and 5.2% at 2, 6, 12, 24, 52 weeks, and final follow-up (7.8–10.5 years), respectively. The mean VAS autograft harvest site pain at final follow-up was 4.4 (range, 0.0–97.0), with 37.9% of subjects reporting at least some pain. For three subjects (5%) with clinically significant pain (VAS >20) at final follow-up, two had proximal tibial harvest sites and one had an iliac crest harvest site. There was no correlation between graft volume and harvest site pain. This study is the first to examine long-term pain following autologous bone graft harvest for hindfoot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Over a third of patients reported having some pain at an average follow-up of nine years, with 5% experiencing clinically significant pain. The results of this study suggest that harvesting autograft bone carries a risk of persistent, long-term pain regardless of the volume of graft that is harvested. This potential for persistent pain should be considered when informing patients of procedure risks and when deciding to use autograft or a bone graft substitute material

One assumed function of Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) is that by maintaining ankle joint motion we can protect the other hind foot joints from further degredation. 1. However, there is no work to our knowledge that compares hindfoot outcomes between TAR and arthrodesis. Sokolowski et al. found that 68% of TAR patients had no radiological progression of subtalar arthritis after TAR, and 4% went on to fusion. 2. However, no evaluation of the other hindfoot joints was made and no comparison made to other treatment. We performed a retrospective review of all patients at our centre who had had a TAR or ankle arthrodesis since 2002. Case notes and imaging were reviewed and all instances of hindfoot treatment (injections or surgical procedures) noted. Patients were excluded who had no documentation, were followed up at other hospitals, had prior hindfoot fusion, or were having staged surgeries at the time of index treatment. Chi squared analysis was used to compare the cohorts. 214 arthrodesis cases and 302 TAR were eligible. The average age was 57. Average time to follow up was 13 years (4–21). At the time of abstract submission 107 sets of notes had been reviewed fully. Full analysis will be performed by conference. 14% of TAR patients went on to have further procedures to the hindfoot joints while 35% of arthrodesis patients had further procedures (p=0.014). There was also a significant difference in the number of patients progressing to fusion of a further hindfoot joint between groups (TAR- 4%, arthrodesis- 20%, p=0.01). These data suggest that TAR are protective of symptomatic change of hindfoot joints. Patients with TAR had fewer hindfoot fusions than those with arthrodesis and also fewer procedures of any form, including injections

Background. Ankle and hindfoot fusion in the presence of large bony defects represents a challenging problem. Treatment options include acute shortening and fusion or void filling with metal cages or structural allograft, which both have historically low union rates. Impaction grafting is an alternative option. Methods. A 2 centre retrospective review of consecutive series of 32 patients undergoing hindfoot fusions with impaction bone grafting of morselised femoral head allograft to fill large bony void defects was performed. Union was assessed clinically and with either plain radiography or weightbearing CT scanning. Indications included failed total ankle replacement (24 patients), talar osteonecrosis (6 patients) and fracture non-union (2 patients). Mean depth of the defect was 29 ±10.7 mm and mean maximal cross-sectional area was 15.9 ±5.8 cm. 2. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis was performed in 24 patients, ankle arthrodesis in 7 patients and triple arthrodesis in 1 patient. Results. Mean age was 57 years (19–76 years). Mean follow-up of 22.8 ±8.3 months. 22% were smokers. There were 4 tibiotalar non-unions (12.5%), two of which were symptomatic. 10 TTC arthrodesis patients united at the tibiotalar joint but not at the subtalar joint (31.3%), but only two of these were symptomatic. The combined symptomatic non-union rate was 12.5%. Mean time to union was 9.6 ±5.9 months. One subtalar non-union patient underwent re-operation at 78 months post-operatively after failure of metalwork. Two (13%) patients developed a stress fracture above the metalwork that healed with non-operative measures. There was no bone graft collapse with all patients maintaining bone length. Conclusion. Impaction of morselised femoral head allograft can be used to fill large bony voids around the ankle and hindfoot when undertaking arthrodesis, with rapid graft incorporation and no graft collapse despite early loading. This technique offers satisfactory union outcomes without the need for shortening or synthetic cages

Management of ankle arthritis in young patients is challenging. Although ankle arthrodesis gives consistent pain relief, it leads to loss of function and adjacent joint arthritis. Ankle joint distraction (AJD) has been shown to give good outcomes in adults with osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis. The efficacy in children or young adults and those with juvenile idiopathic arthritis is less well evidenced. Clinical notes and radiographs of all patients (n=6) managed with AJD in one tertiary referral centre were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographs were taken pre-surgery, intra-operatively, 1 month following frame removal and at the last follow up, tibiotalar joint space was assessed using ImageJ software. Measurements were taken at the medial, middle and lateral talar dome using frame components as reference. Radiographic data for patients with a good clinical outcome was compared with those who did not. At time of surgery mean age was 16.1 years (12 – 25 years). Mean follow up was 3.4 years (1.5 – 5.9 years). Indications were juvenile idiopathic arthritis (4) post-traumatic (1) and post-infective arthritis (1). Three patients at last follow up had a good clinical outcome. Two patients required revision to arthrodesis (1.3 and 2.4 years following distraction). One patient had spontaneous fusion. One patient required oral antibiotics for pin site infection. Inter-observer reliability was 95%. Mean joint space was 1.17mm (SD = 0.87mm) pre-operatively which increased to 6.72mm (SD = 2.23mm) at the time of distraction and 2.09mm (SD = 1.14mm) at the time of removal. At one-year follow up, mean joint space was 1.96mm (SD = 1.97mm). Outcomes following AJD in this population are variable although significant benefits were demonstrated for 50% of the patients in this series. Radiographic joint space preoperatively did not appear to be associated with need for arthrodesis. Further research in larger groups of young patients is required

Introduction. Primary ankle arthroplasty (TAR) is increasingly used to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Reported revision rates of TAR vary from 8.5% to 11.1% at 9 years. Revision surgery remains technically challenging with options ranging from simple joint debridement to tibio-talar-calcaneal fusion. The efficacy of these procedures remains unclear and there is no consensus on optimal revision options. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients undergoing surgery for a failed primary TAR at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (2004–2021). TAR failure was determined by clinical assessment, serial radiographs and CT scans. Primary outcome measures included type and time of index surgery post TAR. Secondary outcomes included frequency of re-operations, post-operative complications, patient reported outcomes and union rate (for revision arthrodesis procedures). Results. 70 failed TARs in 69 patients (35M:34F, mean 65.7 years, s.d.=11.6) underwent re-operation a mean of 6.24 years (range 1–30) post primary. In total, 107 operations were performed including revision fusion (n=50), revision arthroplasty (n=14), bearing exchange (n=9) and joint clearance (n=9). The overall revision fusion union rate was 73.5% over a mean of 12.5 months (s.d.=7.6). 16/23 (69.6%) Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal and 9/12 (75%) ankle fusions (previous subtalar/triple fusion) using a hindfoot nail united over a mean 11.4 months (s.d.=6.0) and 15 months (s.d.=9.48) respectively. Only 64% of ankle fusions using screws alone united (mean=10.6 months, s.d.=8.14). The average post-operative MOXFQ score was 28.3 (s.d.=19.3). 73% said the operation improved their function and would recommend it to a friend/family member. Conclusion. Despite low post-operative MOXFQ scores, over 70% of patients were satisfied with re-operation for a failed TAR. Over 26% of all TAR revision fusions fail to unite with the highest non-union rates observed post ankle arthrodesis with screws alone (36.4%)

Ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis has a high patient satisfaction level; however, gait analysis and functional outcome measurements demonstrate substantial disability. The high patient satisfaction may reflect the extent of disability present prior to the intervention. This study demonstrates that the presence of subtalar or talonavicular arthritis and/or limited motion is a negative predictor for a satisfactory outcome. The risk of developing arthritis of these joints increases with time and therefore the patient can expect a deterioration of their initial result. Ankle arthrodesis should be considered a salvage procedure. Viable alternatives that preserve motion should continue to be explored. The purpose of this study was to utilize gait analysis and validated outcome measures to assess the results of an ankle arthrodesis and compare these results to a healthy age – sex matched control group. Isolated Ankle arthrodesis has a high patient satisfaction rate; however, gait analysis and functional outcome scores demonstrate a significant difference when compared to controls. The presence of limited subtalar and midfoot motion and/or arthritis correlates with a poor clinical result. This study will help the clinician predict outcomes and better educate patients as to the expected results following ankle arthrodesis. Twenty-six patients with an isolated ankle arthrodesis underwent gait analysis and functional outcome assessment using AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale, MODEMS (includes SF-36) and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). A radiographic analysis was preformed. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Results were compared to a group of twenty-six controls. Seventy-seven percent were satisfied and eighty-eight percent would recommend it to a friend. These perceived outcomes did not correlate well with their average Functional Outcome scores and gait analysis. The AOFAS score rated 46% as excellent or good. The MODEMS identified significant differences in Physical Function, Role-Physical and Physical Composite means when compared to controls. The AOS identified significant differences in Pain and Disability means. Gait analysis demonstrated significant differences in stride length, cadence, hip flexion, hindfoot flexion, hindfoot inversion and midfoot flexion. Decreased hindfoot and midfoot motion correlated with poorer outcome scores. Poor radiographic scores correlated with decreased hindfoot/midfoot motion and poorer clinical outcomes. Ankle arthrodesis should be considered a salvage procedure. Viable alternatives that preserve ankle motion should continue to be explored

Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the use of Ilizarov external fixator for ankle arthrodesis in severe post-traumatic or other ankle arthritis. Patients and Methods: In the period of 8 years, 19 patients underwent ankle arthrodesis with the Ilizarov external fixator for severe ankle arthritis. In four patients the indication for arthrodesis was infection following failed surgical management of tibia plafond fractures, four patients had failed prior ankle arthrodesis and the rest suffered severe ankle arthritis. Eleven patients were male, eight female, with a mean age of 52 years (range 30–71 years). Seven patients had deformities greater then 10°. All had painful stiff ankle joints and 12 patients had disorder of ankle joint anatomy with significant limp. Anterior approach to the ankle joint was preferred, associated with distal fibular osteotomy. Secondary gradual corrections of postoperative deformity and additional compression at the arthrodesis site were performed with the Ilizarov system by closed manipulation. Following frame removal the arthrodesis was immobilised in a cast for a mean of 4 weeks. Results: The mean follow-up period was 3,9 years. A solid ankle arthrodesis was achieved in 18 of the 19 cases. Failure of solid arthrodesis was detected in one patient with insufficient arthroscopic removal of articular cartilage and internal fixation was performed. In one case with major pin tract infection at the distal talus ring distal expansion of the frame was required. According to the Mazur rating system in 12 patients the results were good, in 5 patients fair and in 2 patients poor. Conclusion: The use of Ilizarov external fixator for ankle arthrodesis provides significant interfragmentary compression forces, allows early weight bearing and post-operative adjustment of alignment of arthrodesis. This method should be considered as the treatment of choice in ankle arthrodesis, especially in revision cases and in the cases with infection around of the ankle joint

A significant portion of ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis procedures performed in British Columbia are funded by the public medical services plan (MSP). However, some patients are treated privately through self-pay or by the workers compensation board (WCB), with the latter two groups being more likely to receive treatment sooner. The potential effect of payer on patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates has not been previously explored. A retrospective chart review was performed using data from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Prospective Ankle Reconstruction Database. N=443 patients (393 MSP, 26 self-pay, 24 WCB), treated with total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis by three subspecialty-trained surgeons in Vancouver from 1999–2003, were analyzed. Outcomes were compared, by payer, preoperatively and at long-term follow-up (6.3 years, range 2–14 years). Function was assessed using the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) Total score (primary outcome) and the AOS Pain and Difficulty subscores. Expectation and satisfaction with symptoms was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Scale, and physical and emotional quality of life was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey in terms of the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS). Swelling and reoperation rates were also compared. AOS Total score was not significantly different between payers. WCB patients had significantly worse preoperative AOS Difficulty scores (73, 95%CI 65–80) compared to MSP (65, CI 63–67) and self-pay patients (56, CI 49–63)(p < 0 .008). Their SF-36 MCS scores were also significantly worse pre- and postoperatively (WCB: 43, CI 38–49, 45, CI 40–50, MSP: 51, CI 50–52, 51, CI 50–52, self-pay: 51, CI 46–56, 54, CI 49–58)(p < 0 .03). AOS Pain scores and SF-36 PCS scores were not different. Pre- and postoperatively, MSP patients reported more satisfaction with symptoms (1.31, CI 1.24–1.38, 3.21, CI 3.07–3.35), compared to WCB (1.13, CI 0.84–1.41, 2.83, CI 2.26–3.41) and self-pay patients (1.19, CI 0.91–1.47, 2.88, CI 2.33–3.44). Preoperatively, WCB patients had the lowest expectations (76, CI 69–84), the worst AOS Total (64, CI 57–71) and SF-36 scores (MCS 43, CI 38–49, PCS 28, CI, 25–32), and the most swelling (3.5, CI 3.1–4). Conversely, self-pay patients had the highest preoperative expectations (88, CI 81–95), the best AOS Total (53, CI 46–60) and SF-36 scores (MCS 51, CI 46–56, PCS: 34, CI 30–37) and the least swelling (3, CI 2.6–3.4). Postoperatively, WCB and self-pay patients had lower expectations met (35, CI 23–47 and 40, CI 28–51) and worse AOS Total scores (36, CI 27–45 and 35, 26–43), compared to MSP patients (Expectations: 29, CI 26–32, AOS Total: 31, CI 29–33). Reoperation rates were similar among groups. WCB patients had significantly more difficulty with symptoms prior to surgery and worse SF-36 MCS scores pre- and postoperatively. The preoperative expectations of WCB patients were lowest, while those of self-pay patients were highest. Both groups had lower expectations met postoperatively

A variety of surgical procedures are reported for the management of large volumetric bone loss about the ankle. Although the success rates of these various methods are generally adequate for fusion, they commonly utilize autogenous bone graft and usually result in limb shortening. In seven patients a titanium spinal cage was utilized as a structural support augmented with bone graft for complex ankle arthrodesis. This technique offers immediate structural support, maintenance of limb length, and limits autogenous graft morbidity. Early results of ankle arthrodesis with this cage are encouraging with regard to fusion rates, aesthetic attribute and functional outcome. To present a novel method of tibio-talar and tibio-calcaneal arthrodesis utilizing a titanium spinal cage for the management of bone loss. Complex ankle arthrodesis management with a spinal cage offers reliable fusion rates (comparable with existing techniques) without limb shortening. A variety of procedures are reported for the challenging management of bone loss in ankle arthrodesis. Although the success rates of these various methods are generally good, they commonly utilize large autogenous bone grafts and are subject to donor site morbidities. Most methods also require significant shortening with commensurate functional and aesthetic deficits. Early results of ankle arthrodesis with a titanium spinal cage are encouraging with regard to fusion rates and functional outcome. A cohort of seven patients treated by this technique has resulted in a 100% fusion rate without loss of limb length. Hindfoot and SMFA scores have revealed good functional results for a usually devastating problem. A titanium cage was utilized as a structural support for complex ankle arthrodesis with large volumetric bone loss. The cage was contoured at the time of each operation to fit in situ. This technique offers immediate structural support and reliable fusion while limiting autogenous graft morbidity and limb shortening

Introduction: Arthrodesis has been recommended for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the ankle joint, especially as the results of prosthetic ankle replacement are not comparable with those achieved with total hip or knee replacement. In vitro studies revealed that ankle arthrodesis restricts kinematics more than total ankle replacement in terms of range of motion as well as movment transfer. However, little is known about in vivo gait patterns in patients with arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Aim of this retropective study was to determine plantar pressure distribution in patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis with a standardized screw fixation technique in a single surgeon population. Methods: 21 patients (7 male/14 female) who underwent isolated unilateral ankle arthrodesis with 3 crossed 7,3 mm AO screws (Synthes Gmbh, Austria) in a standardized technique by a single surgeon between October 2000 and January 2008 have been included in this study. At a mean follow-up of 25 months (range 12 – 75) pedobarograhy (Novel GmbH., Munich), clinical evaluation using the AOFAS hindfoot score and weight-bearing x-rays of the foot were performed. Results: Pedobarographic assessment revealed no statistically significant difference between the operated foot and the contralateral foot eighter in terms of peak pressure, maximum force, contact area and contact time or the gait line parameters velocity of center of pressure, lateral-medial force indices or lateral-medial area indices. The average AOFAS score was 80,5 (range 46 – 92) and mean tibioplantar angle determined on the lateral standing radiograph was 91° (82° – 100°). Non-union didn’t occur in any patient. Discussion: The results of the present study indicate that ankle arthrodesis restores plantar pressure distribution patterns to those of healthy feet. Therefore, the functional outcome of ankle arthrodesis seems to be good as long as the fusion is in fixed in an appropriate position

Background. Ankle arthrodesis results in significantly improved pain and function for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has gained increasing popularity with reports of shorter hospital stays, time to union and equivalent union rates to open arthrodesis. However, there remains a lack of good quality prospective data. Methods. We report a prospective comparative clinical study comparing open and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis at two institutions with two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and secondary outcomes included the SF-36, hospital stay and radiographic alignment. A power calculation was performed. There were 30 patients in each group. Results. Both groups showed a significant improvement in AOS and physical component score (PCS) of the SF-36 at one and two years. There was a significantly greater improvement in AOS scores at one year and two years and shorter hospital stay in the arthroscopic group. There was no significant difference in complications, surgical time or radiographic alignment. Conclusions. Open and Arthroscopic Ankle arthrodesis demonstrate a significant improvement in pain and function as measured by the AOS. Arthroscopic arthrodesis showed improved outcomes at one and two years and a shorter hospital stay

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients surgically treated for end stage ankle arthritis using total ankle arthroplasty or ankle arthrodesis. Method: This is a single center clinical outcome study of the surgical treatment of patients with end stage ankle arthritis (n=81) using an ankle arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical outcome was assessed using health related quality of life (SF36v2) and joint specific (Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Scale and the AAOS Foot and Ankle Baseline Questionnaire(version 2000)) outcome scores. Complications were recorded as well. Results: Preoperatively, all patients had significant physical and psychological morbidity. There was a significant improvement in the health related quality of life and the joint specific clinical outcome scores at 1, 2 and 3 years follow up (p-value.05) Complications included 5 (10%) non union, in the ankle arthrodesis cohort and 2 (6.7%) revisions for aseptic loosening in the total ankle arthroplasty cohort. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that surgical treatment of end stage ankle arthritis with ankle arthrodesis or total ankle arthroplasty equally improve clinical outcome in the short term with acceptable and similar complication rates

Introduction. The existence of various techniques of ankle arthrodesis shows that there are pros and cons in each method. We describe our experience of ankle arthrodesis using a paediatric angle blade plate. Materials and methods. 10 ankle arthrodeses were performed in nine patients. All patients were reviewed independently in special clinics. The objective assessment was performed by detailed clinical examination and the subjective assessment was made including overall patient satisfaction. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hind foot scoring system was used. The technique of ankle arthrodesis was similar in all patients using an anteromedial or anterolateral incision, preparation of articular surface and paediatric angle blade plate fixation with or without bone grafting. Time to union was assessed by clinical and radiological examinations. Results. Radiological union was achieved in nine patients in a mean time of 16 weeks. Fibrous union occurred in one patient. Eight patients were very satisfied with their treatment. The patient with fibrous union had a marginal improvement of symptoms with pain score improved from nine to seven. The mean AOFAS score was 84. Conclusion. Ankle arthrodesis with a paediatric angle blade plate is a useful method of managing intractable cases of ankle arthritis. The technique is simple and effective with excellent success rate

Introduction. Review of the literature indicates variable results for ankle arthrodesis with many complications. With improved prothesis and technique for total ankle arthroplasty and an increase in severe ankle deformities such as Charcot's joint and the neuropathic diabetic foot we are faced with the need to decrease the variables in ankle arthrodesis in primary and salvage arthrodesis. We will review current methods for ankle arthrodesis and critic how they deal with primary and revision ankle arthrodesis surgery. Materials and methods. A customised plate or modified synthes proximal tibial plate and technique for salvage of complex pathology utilising a anterior approach and application of a contoured ustomised plate with co-axial screw fixation. Anterior incision was performed with removal of the lateral malleolus, for bone grafting in revision cases only. Thirteen arthrodeses were performed; four of these were pan-talar. All patients underwent objective and subjective assessments including overall patient satisfaction. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hind foot scoring system was used. The aim of this study is to identify the time taken to achieve radiologic arthrodesis, complications encountered, the required post-operative recovery for arthrodesis to be achieved and the overall patient satisfaction of results in the early to midterm post-operative period have been followed up for three years. Conclusion. The technique offers considerable flexibility allowing the calcaneus to be incorporated in the proposed arthrodesis where necessary. With multiple points for fixation and coaxial screw entry points the contoured customised plate provides a rigid fixation for arthrodesis stabilisation with added compression being the major advantage of this technique

We aim to assess the outcome of ankle arthrodesis performed for painful osteoarthritis in the presence of a coronal plane deformity of 20 degrees or more. To our knowledge this is the first reported series of such a cohort of patients. We have a consecutive and complete series of 24 patients with 26 ankle arthrodeses which were all performed for painful osteoarthritis in the presence of large coronal plane deformity. These patients have a minimum of twelve months clinical follow-up. The results showed a low non-union rate of 8% (2 ankles). These have subsequently been re-fused satisfactorily, and are excluded from further analysis. The results of the remaining 24 ankles, which united primarily, show that patients were very pleased with the outcome of their surgery. AOFAS scores were used to measure pain and function, both pre-operatively and post-operatively. These scores showed large improvements for both pain and function, and had a high statistical significance (p<0.0001). All patients improved in their walking distance and many patients reduced their need for walking aids. Stair climbing ability was also improved in some patients. It is recognised that an ankle arthrodesis usually relieves pain but does not result in a normal gait and full function. We feel that the high level of patient satisfaction in this series was due to the combination of deformity correction, restoring a functional foot position, and achieving a painless ankle. Arthroplasty of the ankle is a good procedure for relief of pain and restoration of function. However, in the presence of a large coronal plane deformity, ankle arthroplasty is known to fare badly with early failure. Therefore for patients with painful osteoarthritis and a coronal plane deformity of 20 degrees or more, we recommend ankle arthrodesis as the procedure of choice